| re: Showbiz 411 article |
|
Posted by:
 |
The_Count 07:20 pm MST 06/16/12 |
| In reply to: |
re: Showbiz 411 article - steven_stuart 07:38 pm MST 06/15/12 |
|
but the legal situation has now changed (as the article points out) and anyone can do a Peter Pan show without permission but they still have to pay royalties to the hospital.
Could you expand on this a bit? I see that 'Peter And The Starcatcher', a prequel to Barrie's play is now a musical on Broadway. How is it they had no problems with the estate? There are four young adult prequel novels written by Dave Barry and Ridley Pearson out plus a few preteen volumes as well. I saw a scene done on this years Tony awards.
By the way, could anyone explain why they would change the original name Peter and the Starcatchers, to a single Starcatcher? Makes no sense to me.
If this show does indeed come to pass, I plan on being there as early as possible after how quickly Dance of the Vampires folded.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Showbiz 411 article - steven_stuart 07:38 pm MST 06/15/12 |
| Next: |
re: Showbiz 411 article - rockfenris2005 08:22 pm MST 06/16/12 |
|
| Thread: |
|