not logged in
| re: Well I'm leaving | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 03:59 am UTC 06/23/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Well I'm leaving - Leesa 02:34 am UTC 06/23/07 |
You are the phoniest bitch I have ever seen. If it wasn't actually dipping into the apparent views of slander I would make a parallel between you and one other that would place everything into its proper perspective. > And Jim, the Jim Steinman who composed Bat Out Of Hell > and so many other pieces we love and are drawn together > by, I believe, stated in his official fan blog that he > wouldn't know this nutcase from Eve. I could if so inclined, turn this into a play on words if one looks at "Wonderful Toys" in the line, "You see that girl over there, that's my beloved, my paramour, isn't she fine? Well, I hate every bone in her body except MINE! Oh well." That is a direct reference to the biblical Adam and Eve which I have pointed out previously. Oops, I think I just did. ..according to Susan > now, No, the thing I have been saying the most is that there are two men on this slate of one name. The only thing that is NOW, is someone's exploitation of it to make it look like I am making things up as I go along. Silly cheap and rhetorical shot, but you don't get the point. Jim is at least 2 separate people Is only two separate people. We aren't growing in the litany of Jims. Only two. But, we both know that I have been describing Cypherd in other terms. Get your Jims right. --well, one of them > was married to her, one was the 'elder Jim', one was the > 'younger Jim'....whatever. Your lack of comprehension is only matched by your malice. Whatever. > JD appeals to our 'compassion', but you take an idiotic > out there post like this last of hers and is there any > wonder longtime regulars are just fed up? You are the leader of the longtime "regulars" you would not have looked in here at all if someone didn't call you because you do rhetoric better than they do. You are the pboniest one amongst them. The reason why is because you are the one most protecting something you have no right to. >Does Jim trul > enjoy the shit this person posts? He states in a rare blog > posting distancing himself from her and at first she gets > the message--then she's BACK!!!! Now we have 'Jim Cypherd' > is really yet another Jim Steinman... There is nothing new. There is no NOW. Only your use of something old to make look new. I've been telling and telling that the Jim I know, is not the Jim who comes to the Mohegan Sun, not the Jim who comes to OTT, and it is right that he make the statement that he isn't the guy. But that still does not mean that I ain't the girl. > The fact this very sick person cannot stay away from this > format after being shut down by JIM HIMSELF should go to > show what delusional obsession she has. > Jim, be damned careful out there! Cuz she's still on the > loose! The only thing delusional is anyone believing that there is nothing concrete of offered value on my site to make it clear and logical, so that it is obvious that I have none such delusions. Your line of havoc is a smokescreen. You don't have delusions, you make illusions. Just shut your mouthhole and put down your pen. It's over. Every part of your deception is over. It's in black and white, photo to photo email address to email address, search to search, and packaged together like a neat package with a bow on it. Give it up. You only make it worse for yourself. > Leesa > > > > Whooooo hooooo! The bitch is back!!!! > > I'm only replying because you got stuff wrong. Now I'll > > correct you. Steinman IS two separate people, been saying > > it and saying it and saying it some more. There's both > > Steinman, born in 194something and Cypherd born in > > 195something, and Steinman is that guy you see on the blog > > photo, and Cypherd is the guy who looks totally terrific > > in a football jersey above (in my biased but humble > > opinion). Steinman is the guy who has the long light > > colored hair above on the far left, and Cypherd is the one > > with the white gloves on on the far right. Steinman > > applied to a school on the behest of his cousin and the > > cousin went to the school on his name. Then that is how > > Cypherd became Steinman for awhile, at school. He kind of > > remained Steinman because things kind of happened that > > way. But he is also Cypherd. Steinman meanwhile got to > > remain really close and tight with his cousin, Cypherd and > > Cypherd took ideas for songs from Steinman and wrote them > > using the name Steinman, and STeinman went along to the > > studio sessions, got to know everyone that Cypherd knows > > as Steinman, and so there are two, and people really know > > Jim Steinman who is Jim Steinman and they know Jim Cypherd > > who is Jim Cypherd and Jim Steinman. They don't tell > > anyone because they haven't been told it would be a good > > idea to tell anyone, and they don't have any reason to > > break the confidence. So they don't. There aren't any > > imposter Jim Steinmans that I know of. > > > > I only met Jim Steinman who is Jim Steinman once in my > > life when I was six years old, but I know Jim Cypherd who > > is Jim Steinman for much longer. I think the blog is > > possibly being written by Jim Steinman who is Jim Steinman > > and I defer to his truth but not entirely to his > > recollection. > > > > IXOYE | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: You Didn't Even Pay Enough Attention To Reach The Right Thread. This is A Business Trip. - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 09:26 pm UTC 06/23/07 |
| Next: | re: Well I'm leaving - GTKarber 10:49 am UTC 06/23/07 |
| Thread: |
|