not logged in
| re: Hello...hello....hello....(simulated echo sound) | |
Posted by:  |
Marvello 12:39 am UTC 06/30/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Hello...hello....hello....(simulated echo sound) - pidunk 11:34 pm UTC 06/29/07 |
| RAMBLE, RAMBLE, i see nothings changed.........me gone > > > > Susan, > > I'm gonna break my 'don't feed the sick troll' rule once. > > And I will break my "don't reply to Leesa rule" here. > > > In your sorry defence I must say that you are a very > > entertaining individual who has perhaps more creativity > > than most states' populous combined. > > I honestly don't. But I guess at times of stress I have > the crucial sense of humor. > > > >The 'muse', or > > whatever it is, certainly has infused you. You are > > actually a guilty pleasure of mine in the way some people > > devour romance novels...if you'd re-reined half of the > > energy you've put into your website ramblings alone, you > > really could have impacted the world in an amazingly > > positive way. > > Actually some people may prefer I place my energy here > than elsewhere, because my other website is a doozy. > > > > I have no idea what you've been hospitalised for in the > > past or the exact nature of your disorder, but it truly is > > sad you can't get your proverbial shit together. > > Yes indeed, this is something that troubles me as well. As > I've explained rather, er, imaginatively you say, but > factually in real, my life has certain unique features and > difficulties not of my own making nor control. And, not of > sickness, but impedements. I don't expect you to > understand, not the details per se, but surely you must > have some insight that some lives are inherently more > complicated than others. I'm not a "Drew Barrymore" with > drug problems like she has had, that I must overcome. I am > not a mental defective, mentally ill person. But demands > are placed on my stamina to think and to live, on a > persistent basis. My ability to "get my shit together" is > directly proportional with a combination of the effects of > my heart condition, and the reductions of impetus of > outsiders to shove their necks into my business. > > > > >Because > > you're really very interesting. And it's obvious that Jim, > > Richard O'Brien, and others have really impacted you on > > alot of levels. > > Actually all this is a big pain in the ass. > > > >They've impacted me as well. > > I'm going out on an unpopular limb here and say that > > you're really one of the most intelligent, intriguing > > people that have posted here in 10 years. > > > Thank you. > > > > But you're nuts. > > Uh, well, no, but I eat nuts. Does that mean that I am > what I eat? Hmmmm.....what I am is put upon, imposed on, > by these circumstances that I rather did not exist, but > finding them urges me to counter for lack of another > possibility to acquiesce. Is it something I expected? No, > is it something I like? No. Do I wish that I knew how to > handle it better? Yes. But if handling it better and > handling it the way that I am handling it makes me appear > nuts, then I realize that I may appear nuts, but only to > those who will not look at what I have actually written. > You can have all of your notions about what you think I > write, and what you think I show, but until you go through > the time it takes to look at the material, you are as > ignorant as a tree's leftover stump. > > You have read enough only to know what I have written of > you. But there are in fact, laugh if you must, two Leesas, > and one of them denied being you. Well that's fine, but > the reason why I was looking at "her" was because I was > looking at "you" as based on not just your activity here, > but your venomous posts in 2005 which seemed so out of > balance, that I began doing searches on you. I never > face-to-face knew someone named Leesa, but this other > Leesa is in fact the person I believed you to be. Now, you > say that you are not the same as her? Well, I don't know > what to say about that. Will all the liars in the world, > suddenly admit to lying so that we could just clear this > whole thing up? Meanwhile, it was the other Leesa who was > so adamant on removing the words on my website. It is her, > who is called Leesa Magoch Johnson, who is actually the > person I write of, and the features I describe are real, > documented, distributed to third parties for archiving and > so forth. If it is not you, then just sit back and relax. > But how would you explain the difference between you and > the other? Or for that matter, the sameness? I know > face-to-face the name Magoch, its origins, as well as the > person who the other Leesa is. I found her because of you, > and would not have found her if you had not posted so > virulently against me on the board in 2005. So I wondered, > what is this Leesa all about that she would show up > suddenly and have so much to say that is so ferocious? > What is behind her energy of this? The only thing I know > is that the email addresses are different, one that has a > biography in the State of Iowa, seems to be you, and I > could not find any particular identifiers putting you as > other than a part time resident, or a part time animal > control official, in a small town where people can cover > each others' backs pretty darn well. Meanwhile, the person > who the other Leesa is, has a combination of both Arizona > as her alter ego location, and Idaho as her more ordinary > bio. Is it my fault that some people decide that they > don't want to be pinned down and made responsible, or > recognized, for that matter, for acts of wrongdoing? It is > a travesty. It is hellish to keep track of. And if > publishing is the only way to get this thing this whole > mess out into the open, then viva la web. By the way, the > person I knew, who is the other Leesa, talked alot about > wanting to be in Animal Control. How can I tell these > apart? I asked the other Leesa to show me her drivers > license, and she refused. Instead she sent me photos of > the girl I believed she was and said they are of her. She > had a website and gave me a link and that tied in with her > long time best friend's site, not by link but by > javascript. And, posts she made, some of them didn't come > from Arizona, but from direct company assignment by > Microsoft, at Microsoft's physical location. So, do I have > a chore on my hands, do I have facts? Yes. Facts are not > the same as answers. How do you explain that in the other, > I found the one who seems to be you? By the way, it is not > just anyone I am referring to, but the creator and leader > of the entire Rocky Horror cult. > > What do people in that cult do? They put Jim down and make > it look impossible for him to have been involved in RH, > and they do it aggressively. Just because a blog comes > along and says what it says, should not be a rule, but be > a parenthesis. > > > > >And that sucks. > > It all sucks. > > > > >So many people very close > > to me are just like you and frankly it scares me. > > You don't know anyone else like me. > > > > >I feel > > sometimes like a 'marginal magnent'. A very close friend > > of mine, VERY smart and interesting, had schizophrenia, > > went off her meds and there was no saving her. Things > > snowballed. I've never seen such a change in a person. It > > was heatbreaking because I couldn't save her--she'd have > > taken me down as well and I went down as far as I could > > have. > > When someone is mentally ill, you know it. There is no > taking down or going down or being down, there is the > absence of reason meeting the tragedy of loss. > > > > > I can't figure you out. > > Why not show reasons why I should be able to figure you > out instead, so that you could be ruled out and notated as > the Leesa but not that Leesa? You don't have to know me, > but as long as you don't give me what I need to know, you > are on the site along with the other Leesa. Think of it as > a TRW credit report. We have the data...show where it is > wrong. Why are you on the site so closely guarding the > identity of Richard Smith as Richard O'Brien as being the > same as was in RH? Why are you guarding the interests of > the other Leesa? > Why are you disavowing all knowledge of the world we live > in as complicated at the same time as having those > interests? > Why are you likening me to Mark David Chapman, when you > know damned well that is a hostile deflection of guilt? In > the past century so many patterns of liars have come out > that make you seem like a cookie. > > Liars think that all they need to do is lie. They are > different in their skills, but one method is to make > several people of themselves, brazenly with one name > perhaps, and say, oh no that's not me, meanwhile I think > that someone is using another man's father to point to as > someone to mourn when the other and real man is alive and > well on some tropical island. Liars lie loud, they lie > long, they lie with friends, they lie with enemies, and > they lie with anger, and they lie with smiles. But its all > lies, anyway. > I've got more indications that I have the truth than you > have denials to bring. > > As of this writing, there is only one person I know of who > has fully studied my website. That is in the past two > days, the family locale of the boyfriend I referred to in > the posts concerning Benoit, below. Funny how things turn. > The one who I have the most anxiety of for reactions, is > the one who is most interested, and interested now. And > you come up and give me this crap? Why not read what I > write with some seriousness and do some favors for the > truth in the world. > > > > > > >What really bothers me is the > > invented fiction you've supposedly created about me--you > > have NO accurate information about me. No one from Rockman > > ever has called me. I have no established alliances with > > any posters. There is no 'free republic' or 'Daveed > > website', false biography, photos from '78...I don't know > > you; you never have contacted me about photos, I don't > > even know what the hell a java script is, snazzy or > > otherwise--you've never supported me (no one has, except > > my parents when I was a minor years ago). > > Also, you never phoned me the night of John Lennon's > > murder--I was overseas living with a family that had no > > phone--in fact, I first learned that Lennon had been > > 'shot' at 8am at work--didn't know that he'd actually been > > killed until I went home for lunch that so that means to > > me that: > > I have the evidence that I have and it has your name on > it. > It also has the area of your interest here and your > personality. So you are writing rubbish nonsense and false > denials. Relax, you aren't in court. I don't need your > false alibi. Maybe someone else named Leesa was overseas. > "There are too many men making too many problems, and not > much love to go 'round"--Phil Collins, "Land Of Confusion" > 1987. > > > > > > 1) You have me confused with someone else > > 2) You're deliberately and maliciously lying > > 3) You're so impaired that you don't realise what's going > > on. > > Someone who is innocent has an entirely different tack > than yours. It is easy to sniff out a liar, they are the > ones who attack the ones who they should instead implore. > The other Leesa tried the imploring, and in the > correspondence gave me the evidence harder than I had even > before. Slam dunk. > > > > > > I truly hope you haven't actually wasted the amount of > > time on me that you claim because it's all sadly VERY > > wasted, judging from the accuracy conveyed by you. > > Lots of accuracy, and lots of smoke in the way of others > to see it because it is accurate. Desperation knows > insults. You are both desperate and insulting. > > > > > People aren't put off by you're 'philosophical > > challenges', but you're blatatent lies. > > I don't write lies. > > > > There's a huge difference that does really matter. > > I really do like you in a strange way; but you're > > channeled completely wrong. > > You don't have to like me. I don't need the conning from > you. > > > > I really do wish you all the best because you seem have so > > much to offer--but we have to find a way for you to > > understand why people hate you--and trust me dear, it's > > not your voice... > > Well, hell, I know that. But you don't have to be so > damned nice to make you seem so damned honest when you are > lying in every direction known to the wind. You are just > experimenting for the right effect. > > Let me make this perfectly clear. Those who don't want to > read the website are not being compelled to. I don't link > it here. Others know how and where to find it. I did not > organize it to be obvious. The part where there is history > and information about others are in a virtual book called > "What Happened To Rocky Horror" which is on one page of > the website, and is a page that takes an estimated five > hours to read. Those with a greater interest in its > content than on the information about Jim Cypherd and Jim > Steinman that I write on the website seek out this volume > and highlight it above all else. Somehow, they find it. > But they won't be in discussion about any of the content > about Jim. So, in proportion, there is so much evidence of > all things that I write, that they would stop others from > reading, and I don't write a thing that I am not > satisfied, journalistically trained, to be accurate. > > I do have another website which people don't want to know > most of the time and has nothing to do with any of this. > I'll show that to you. It shows that I do not involve > myself on the topic of RH exclusively, or the topic of Jim > exclusively, and that it has no other role here but to > show the other and wider dimensions of myself. In this > website, others are discussed. People like Stanley > Milgram, John Kerry, and even members of my family, past, > present, and extended. You won't find mention of Jim > anywhere on it. > > > > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Hello...hello....hello....(simulated echo sound) - pidunk 07:24 am UTC 07/02/07 |
| Next: | re: Hello...hello....hello....(simulated echo sound) - pidunk 01:20 am UTC 06/30/07 |
| Thread: |
|