| re: The Involvement of Synanon | |
|
Posted by: |
Leesa (gallytrotter@mchsi.com) 12:29 pm UTC 07/20/07 |
| In reply to: | re: The Involvement of Synanon - Pudding 05:06 am UTC 07/20/07 |
| I think you're entirely right, Pud. She just goes off farther and farther. I honestly tried to figure out WTF?, but the image of your floating bulldog keeps coming back! The good news is that this Leesa Magach Johnson in Arizona had never heard of Jim until use of her name led her here--she DID know of the Loaf, but no idea of Jim's involvement. Now she can learn all about OUR Jim without the Cypherd-thing. And also if she does come back regularly, there ARE 2 of us--and we both know it. Only Susan will see the great conspiracy...by that times perhaps she'll be taking another 'social time-out'--in the hospital or otherwise.. Cheers! Leesa J (the one in Iowa) > > some piss poor private eye you must have to miss all > > The PI in PIDunk doesn't stand for Private Investigator, > it stands for Probably Insane. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: The Involvement of Synanon - Pudding 05:06 am UTC 07/20/07 |
| Next: | re: The Involvement of Synanon - Pudding 09:47 pm UTC 08/10/07 |
| Thread: |
|