| re: Meat Won't Be Singing Nutz Songs But Body Would Be Great | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 02:15 am UTC 03/25/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Meat Won't Be Singing Nutz Songs But Body Would Be Great - Scaramouche 12:33 am UTC 03/24/13 |
| > > They are now caling it "Nutz". > > This week. LoL. I think either title works. They all want Nutz to be the title now. Jim did call it Nutcracked for a while but people thought it sounded too harsh because it is not the "heavy metal" show that Terry's medical friend told the press about (if you remember, when people started talking about it - even though someone - was it you? - found a newspaper article that had been published on the internet months before). Jim was also calling it Nutz and a decision had to be made. BTW, any chance of another poster? But this time maybe don't make the producer's names bigger than Jim and Terry's names. Although, despite having credits that were smaller than Robert Mackintosh's credit, those two loved it. > Still opening Christmas 2013? If they can find the right venue. > > I don't think that Jim can give Meat any of those songs. For legal reasons. > Legal reasons?? The producers would be missing a trick if > they don't try pushing one of the songs from the show > (with someone). I imagine Meat's album will be out later > this year which would tie in nicely with the show opening > and the Steinman connection? Apparently, he's not recording any "new" Jim songs. I hope he does Body but it belongs on Jim's The Final Flight album and not Meat's new album. If he did end up doing a Nutz song, it would belong on the Nutz album. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Meat Won't Be Singing Nutz Songs But Body Would Be Great - Scaramouche 12:33 am UTC 03/24/13 |
| Next: | re: Meat Won't Be Singing Nutz Songs But Body Would Be Great - rockfenris2005 05:15 am UTC 03/25/13 |
| Thread: |
|