| re: Bat musical on hold? | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 11:34 pm UTC 03/27/13 |
| In reply to: | re: Bat musical on hold? - LordRahl 09:30 pm UTC 03/26/13 |
| > I wish he were selling songs to Meat. I cant stand not > hearing Meat do any new Jim material. The part about the Bat musical being on hold because Jim is not motivated is complete rubbish. You know Jim. Can you believe that? Its actually the opposite. Jim has given his life to creativity and he won't stop until the Lord calls him. And even then. Who knows with Jim? I do agree that it would be great if Meat recorded some new Jim songs. It would be fantastic. Apparently its not going to happen (and someone pointed out to me that Meat did not actually say "new" material - is that true?). But of course it would be wonderful if it happened. Although, I don't really like the idea of Jim selling Meat songs and then Meat takes off with them. I want them to work together until they have a magical finished product. Its almost a shame that they used Jim songs on Bat 3: The Monster Is Loose because they are not at all like songs where Jim has been producer or has at least been involved in the recording process. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Bat musical on hold? - rockfenris2005 10:42 am UTC 03/29/13 |
| Next: | re: Bat musical on hold? - steven_stuart 02:28 am UTC 03/25/13 |
| Thread: | |