HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: The site's Bad For Good Section: Re-Read

Posted by:
pidunk 01:19 pm UTC 05/15/07
In reply to: re: The site's Bad For Good Section: Re-Read - GTKarber 10:58 pm UTC 05/13/07



> It makes me weep. I cannot tell if it is idiocy or lunacy,
> but... please, get a hold of yourself. You have not had
> zillions of conversations with Jim. If you had, you could
> have asked him this very question, and he would have told
> you the answer--that he was not the "featured vocal,"
> which is the credit used for lead singer.

You make a few assumptions which aren't true to make, so that is not a possibility as you may think it is regarding the current ability to talk to Jim and I do not discuss those issues on this board. You are not able to make statements regarding the truth of my experiences with Jim as well. Then, there is indeed a phrase for "lead vocal". It is "lead vocal".




reply |

Previous: re: The site's Bad For Good Section: Re-Read - GTKarber 10:58 pm UTC 05/13/07
Next: re: The site's Bad For Good Section: Re-Read - rockfenris2005 12:26 pm UTC 05/13/07

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE