| re: The site's Bad For Good Section: Re-Read | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 01:19 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| In reply to: | re: The site's Bad For Good Section: Re-Read - GTKarber 10:58 pm UTC 05/13/07 |
> It makes me weep. I cannot tell if it is idiocy or lunacy, > but... please, get a hold of yourself. You have not had > zillions of conversations with Jim. If you had, you could > have asked him this very question, and he would have told > you the answer--that he was not the "featured vocal," > which is the credit used for lead singer. You make a few assumptions which aren't true to make, so that is not a possibility as you may think it is regarding the current ability to talk to Jim and I do not discuss those issues on this board. You are not able to make statements regarding the truth of my experiences with Jim as well. Then, there is indeed a phrase for "lead vocal". It is "lead vocal". | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: The site's Bad For Good Section: Re-Read - GTKarber 10:58 pm UTC 05/13/07 |
| Next: | re: The site's Bad For Good Section: Re-Read - rockfenris2005 12:26 pm UTC 05/13/07 |
| Thread: | |