| re: Dance In My Pants / compared to TMiL. | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 06:39 am UTC 05/16/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Dance In My Pants / compared to TMiL. - Wilbury 06:05 am UTC 05/16/07 |
| >This song is a good > example of how Desmond completely missed the point of > Steinman. > I think that in certain worlds there is a Desmondism just as much as here there is a Steinmanism, to put it into single words. Desmond, as opposed to another producer that could have been chosen or could have agreed to the project, has a solid following amongst a huge segment of the music buying public, and Desmond, in his inimitable acknowledgement of his own power, vied into that for the success of the album. Desmond is an A&R rep's dream, with his eye on the prize as much as the music scales. I do believe that in the artistic sphere, Desmond "gets" Steinman.....but he has to be out of he parallel sway of mogulmania in order that it could show itself in proper light. > > > > I read an earlier post which someone said the didn't like > > DIMP, i love it. Not so much the album version, but the 7" > > edit versions which roll in at 5mins & 7mins. > > > > Although both versions are edited down from the album > > versions, they do both contain added instrumentation. > > Both versions have an extra brass part at the beginning & > > an extra guitar part near the end. > > > > Did Jim create these edits? or was it some faceless > > engineer? > > If it was Jim why were the not on the album version? > > For me these versions sound more complete. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Dance In My Pants / compared to TMiL. - Evil_One 03:53 pm UTC 05/16/07 |
| Next: | re: Dance In My Pants - pidunk 01:03 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| Thread: | |