not logged in
| re: Susan, do you still love "your" Jim? | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 12:35 pm UTC 05/17/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Susan, do you still love "your" Jim? - Markus 10:31 am UTC 05/17/07 |
> Ok, it was two questions. Your answers are: > > Yes, you still love YOUR Jim (who isnīt OUR Jim) > > & > > Yes, you think he (YOUR JIM, not OUR JIM) likes that you > spread all these deatils about his private life. > > Ok, I can live with that. Thank you. > > Markus. Markus, the part about the judgement by fans of what goes on in the lives of the actual artist(s) is really applicable here as well as in the situation between Jim and Meat. It really is not the province of fans to be proxy to the will in the absent of spoken will of the artist. Yours is to admire, not to be an activist. If you decide that activism is more in league with the role, then you become the one who is doing wrong. What I do, is according to Jim's wishes. God only knows his wishes have been complicated. I do not, contrary to your belief, divulge highly personal details about him or his life. I divulge those things that are agreed between he and I to divulge. You asked, and now after I have taken the needed nap in my illness, I now answer more succinctly. Please try not to be the problem that you fear that I am; I am not the problem. Someone brought up the concept of virginity loss, I answered it, and since then a bunch of junior high schoolers have invaded the board repeating it in the most crude sense. When Jim and I made love the first time, it was two people loving each other. What the big deal is, is ridiculous. The words you use belittle that, and Jim, who you claim to respect. It is not a nice phrase. Try to be more circumspect for the possibility that you may want him to see you care. Caring, is not defined by grilling me. But intellectual questions are invited as per usual, and not given as so that pattern continues. When you decide to look at the age imprinted upon your drivers license and act it, I'd be happy to show you that I love Jim and am looking for his best interests. By the way I did previously privately communicate to you that you met "my" Jim at Stuttgart...but you replied something about deleting it and putting my name on your spam list. I wanted to tell you that because you told me on IM that you liked the man you met there. I want to let you know, that confusion aside, you met him for sure there. Many others did not who think they did. It took some time for me to apply my understandings to establish this. I appreciate that you like Jim. As I said, I like him too...I like "my" Jim, and I also like the cousin Jim. Gradually we may get to understand one another. But for now, please do not attack me when you don't understand me. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Susan, do you still love "your" Jim? - Markus 10:31 am UTC 05/17/07 |
| Next: | re: Susan, do you still love "your" Jim? - Markus 12:47 pm UTC 05/17/07 |
| Thread: |
|