| re: Smeghead | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 01:00 am UTC 05/18/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Smeghead - Smeghead 12:54 am UTC 05/18/07 |
> what angers me most is the last time you were on here > and spreading your shit there were people who actually > said "Maybe what she says could be true." Smeg, let's try to put the "last time" in perspective. Some of the things that people said could be true, were seen by me as some of the impersonated fabrications said on my name, rather than said by me; in addition those things that I said that could be true if so acknowledged then, are not major big things in the world at large and are trivial. Trivial trivia I say sometimes can be true? So what is the problem with that? By the way, Smeg, so much research has fine-tuned what I believed then and actually said of my own accord...the first issue, is how do you know who was me and who was making me look bad? And, was I bad, at my own pure best? I don't know these things from your viewpoint. You seem to have such strong objections. Is it a bad thing that Jimmy drums? Would you like to rehash this thing privately? I don't really care, don't really mind that. As long as the effort is honest. I think we both share enjoyment of peace in the world. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Smeghead - MegaMilton 01:03 am UTC 05/18/07 |
| Next: | re: There's No Such Thing As Hijacking A Topic.... - MegaMilton 12:38 am UTC 05/18/07 |
| Thread: | |