HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Small Minded... Possibly

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 12:38 pm UTC 05/18/07
In reply to: re: Small Minded... Possibly - TNT 12:09 pm UTC 05/18/07


I wasn't hurt by the post, but it gave me a good reason for what I did. Why should I have a member on my forum who thinks I'm a "mental patient" and couldn't even confront me about it? I say that's just as interesting as what I did. I'm not hurt by any of this, really, because there are bigger problems in life.

And yes, I believe in free speech. I have no problems with the controversial posts of some members because they happen to have a head on their shoulders. Never once have I seen them commit felonies (fair enough, bootlegging may be a felony but a) Steinman seems OK with it and b) it's really only a felony when you sell them.) Anyone else who has has been punished. I don't know what Jacqueline's problem is this time. You'll have to ask her.

"Pidunk" spreads nonsensical slander that would be punished in any society. I have seen an Australian novelist get imprisonment for less things. Susan is one of the worst-case scenarios I have seen.

All I've done is respond to her stupid lies and damaging slander and people think it's my problem. But I can't fight that anymore. I just wish she would go away.

Also, I know I've made mistakes in my time ("Weren't we all young once? Didn't we have fun once? Didn't we go to the limits to try new things? Maybe I was young once? I was cheek and tongue once? Didn't I go to the limits in the holiest flow once?") but I am passionate about Jim's music. I do not have an ego and I do not think I'm more important than anyone else. I had a valid reason for banning you because why should I put up with someone who's clearly stated that they don't like me? That's reason enough since I own the board and shouldn't have to put up with anyone feeling that way toward its Admin. And more, you never once discussed the issue with me. You made a public statement on this forum that I wasn't expecting at all.

Was I hurt? No. Surprised? Yes. Was my decision right? I think it was.


> What's really funny about this is that Ryan claimed he
> wasn't hurt by my post (see link), and then he bans me
> from his board, even without a warning. This from someone
> who is so happy for the freedom of speech here at
> Rockman.
>
> What this really proves is that Ryan puts himself above
> everyone else in the Jim Steinman community. He has
> constantly been putting people down, and been acting like
> a jerk. That's no problem according to him, but as soon as
> someone reacts to his behavior his reaction is to ban that
> someone from his board.
>
> This seems like a hell of a double standard, but after all
> double standards is often what the Rockman board is about.
> It's a shame Rockman is so fucked up by sick individuals,
> because we Steinmaniacs really need somewhere to gather on
> the Internet. Unfortunately this somewhere is not Rockman,
> since this place is so full of hatred and bullshit.
> Rockman need rules. To me this board have really been dead
> for a long time, and there's no sign of it coming back to
> life as long as a few thundering loonies look at
> themselves as gods of the Steinman community.


reply |

Previous: re: Small Minded... Possibly - TNT 12:09 pm UTC 05/18/07
Next: re: Small Minded... Possibly - pidunk 10:16 pm UTC 05/18/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE