| re: why? | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 08:59 pm UTC 05/18/07 |
| In reply to: | re: why? - daveake 06:17 pm UTC 05/18/07 |
See the post with the big heading that says that? I realized that after the fact and realigned my statement. Indeed, the audio was not live. I always enjoy seeing a performance even if the audio is live, unless I only cared about the audio. So I suppose it is all about point of view. > The audio was not live. > > Dave > > > > > Was it animated? Jim was there on the stage, and it was > > not the video. I haven't listened to the audio of it in > > awhile (I suppose I ought to find the file and do so) so > > not commenting on the feed, be it mic'd or dubbed, but the > > performance was otherwise live, even if it was pre-taped. > > If this is not what is being referred to, what performance > > is it then? Also, could I ask you incredible wise experts > > on all things Jim, what he told to all of youz why he > > didn't go touring for Bad For Good, or what shows he did > > do? > > > > I was music-incommunicado at the time, for all intents and > > purposes. > > > > > That wasn't live. > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > Would that be the German TV show segment that Pudding put > > > > on his blog awhile back? > > > > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: why? - daveake 06:17 pm UTC 05/18/07 |
| Next: | Reefer Madness - Smeghead 04:30 pm UTC 05/17/07 |
| Thread: | |