| re: Reply to Susan on Bully Topic | |
|
Posted by: |
Leesa (gallytrotter@mchsi.com) 01:01 am UTC 07/26/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Reply to Susan on Bully Topic - Leesa 12:50 am UTC 07/26/07 |
| Susan, we got it to go! It's back on the other thread---Sorry, everybody! Leesa > Sorry, Susan, I can't reply--- tried several times, but > board no longer lets me post. > Leesa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why do you think our numbers in rescue are low? Could it > > > > be because we're RESCUING AND PLACING THE DOGS??? If we > > > > weren't doing it, the numbers would be much higher. > > > > > > >>You call the breed rare, then act like the low numbers of > > > unplaced dogs is your credit. The breed is rare because > > > you keep a lock and key on it. Dogs are popular when they > > > are shown. Dogs are obscure when they are not shown. > > > Somehow, you manage, your collective at any rate, manages > > > to keep these dogs rare, despite Spuds MacKenzie of yore. > > > These dogs are beautiful and very captivating to one's > > > spirit, so it is only their secrecy that keeps them rare. > > > They are charming enough to be in high demand and high > > > supply. Then, there may be a rescue problem, like with > > > other breeds. But you don't have that problem because you > > > are a close knit group keeping these dogs ostensibly to > > > yourselves. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Reply to Susan on Bully Topic - Leesa 12:50 am UTC 07/26/07 |
| Next: | Hot summer night - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 09:02 pm UTC 07/25/07 |
| Thread: | |