So tell me, what with nothing to sell, nothing in particular to advertise, and no particular project in the works to feed this all to, is it that I have to gain by telling these supposed lies? Jim Cypherd benefits from my energies, and I have not seen him face to face in ten years. So, there is no particular incentive, no status, no change in status quo that I have any realistic expectations to make, by saying that he helped me overcome my fear of the dark. And, as things to have attention over, this would not be my first choice. It was not like I presented him with a performance of my twirling championship trophy as a cheerleader, as that would be a lie because in this life anyway, I was not a cheerleader, and I sucked at balancing a baton.
Not only that but you are ignoring the most fundamntal fact. Jim Steinman has not said he does not know Jim Cypherd, and Jim Cypherd has confirmed (without stating relation but the more relevant) friendship with Jim Steinman. So, it is not saliently so much if Steinman knows ME, but if Steinman knows Cypherd, and he does and they do and all is right with the world. Because on the heading of this board is two photos of each of these men. Two of Cypherd (white gloves) and two of Steinman (black gloves). So, get off my case about it.
If you look at Jim Cypherd's blog, you might get a sense of how much he appreciates my participation. And I do love that kind of feedback.
>
> "talking about this with Jim" more lies, like he says in
> his blog he has NEVER met you.
>
|
