| re: WHY? | |
|
Posted by: |
The_Jackster 03:06 am UTC 11/01/07 |
| In reply to: | re: WHY? - Pudding 02:51 am UTC 11/01/07 |
| And I quote, from a convo back in 2005 and 2006: "I have three years to do this shit. I'm not going to wait for Jim." Sounds like pretty definitive timing to me. I say, someone find his last physician. > You're so full of shit. > > Meat has a sore throat and walked off stage unable to > carry on....HE'S NOT DEAD !!!! > > As for the way he sounded, how the fuck would you know? > you weren't even there. > > Also, there's a better chance MEat knowing how Meat is by > phoning him, and not by posting a message on his blog for > the random possibility Meat will read it aswell as every > other nosey twat out there. > > > Well, considering how drastic the circumstances are, Loaf > > might be dead in the next couple days the way he sounded > > (God forbid) and it might be best if Meat sees Jim's > > farewell before he goes ker-plop. > > > > > Just wondering | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: WHY? - Pudding 02:51 am UTC 11/01/07 |
| Next: | re: WHY? - Pudding 03:13 am UTC 11/01/07 |
| Thread: |
|