not logged in
| re: Jackster Is Correct | |
Posted by:  |
AndrewG 11:56 pm UTC 11/06/07 |
| In reply to: | Jackster Is Correct - AbbeyRoad 11:13 pm UTC 11/06/07 |
> Jackster may have a point. It is possible that Meat Loaf > has a serious life threatening medical condition which > stopped him from collaborating with Jim this time around. Bollox, that's pure speculation. Do you honestly see Meat Loaf performing close to 70? That's why he did Bat 3, he didn't have 7 years to do it, that's how Meat saw it. > Apparently Jim wanted to collaborate with Meat on Bat 3, > so that it would be a really special project like Bat 1 > and Bat 2. But Meat gave him a six month deadline and Jim > said it would take much longer than that. So Meat decided > to do it with Desmond Child, throwing in Jim songs, so > that the public would be fooled into thinking that Bat 3 > was a Jim and Meat collaboration. I don't think there is much fooling when Desmond's name is mentioned on the cover and he apparently seems to have more dedicated liner notes in the CD booklet than Meat himself for some bizarre reason. The majority of the cd buying population probably don't know who Steinman is. > I don't like to criticise Meat. In his prime he was as > exciting as Elvis. But what a shame he couldn't have > waited. Well that under your own speculation (he has a medical problem) would probably have meant no album and no live tour now would it... > I have heard rumours that he has a serious medical > condition which will eventually stop him from being able > to tour or record. Perhaps that is why he rushed. I don't believe you and besides it's a rumour so who gives a fuck. > It was not just the songs and production that Jim needed > time for. He needed to fix Meat Loaf's badly damaged > voice. Bollox. Even Jim noted that Meat sounded fantastic on Bat 3. > If you read Meat's book, his voice was damaged before Bat > 2 and it was Jim who used a number of methods to bring it > back to life. You've posted this before. Can you please quote the page numbers as I don't believe Meat's voice was damaged at all during the period of 1984-1993 going by the albums and the live shows. > If Meat had let Jim help him, not only would Bat 3 have > been great, but his tour would have been far more > successful. He wouldn't be loosing his voice half way > during a concert. I doubt loosing his voice would have been different. Maybe this cyst has been growing for a year, who the fuck knows. > But perhaps the medical condition rumours are true and > poor old Meat had no choice. So why post what you have posted? > By the way, Wolf With The Red Roses, you should wash your > mouth out with soap. No you should. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Going on what Fireball said to me @ MLUKFC - rockfenris2005 07:35 am UTC 11/07/07 |
| Next: | riddle me this - EvilNickname 11:22 pm UTC 11/06/07 |
| Thread: | |