> So in short, there's absolutely nothing Jim could've
> taught ALW about musical theatre.
Oh, I dunno, I'm not supposed to know the specifics. It never happened. I just think he would have made Andrew more feral, like a rock Sondheim taking more weird chances. I don't know if that would have been successful, but I certainly think he would be looked upon a little differently.
>
> Andrew Lloyd Webber's musical successes speak for
> themselves and so do Jims.
Absolutely.
|
