I second that. It's always been part of the intrigue of the song, it begs you look deeper into it.
> Well said.
>
> > To be fair, the "that" was, to a large extent, part of the
> > song's selling point. It got people thinking/talking when
> > they first heard it, and whenever IDAFL is mentioned these
> > days, the same question always comes up.
> >
> > Whether Jim intended it or not, it's been a great benefit
> > and it keeps people talking about the song 14 years after
> > it was first released.
> >
> > Which can't be a bad thing...?
|
