Dunno what Todd has got to do with this.
I tried to make a cogent arguement about why certain acts need Eurovision.
It's sure it's not the first time you've mentioned Britny, this time the infamous "pantieless" photo, you seem to have a strange fascination for her'
For my part i never had any interest in her or her music, pantied or unpantied, but i'm sure her sort of "pop" music would be suitable for Eurovision. Personally i like my music a little more challenging than a song contest and Britny.
> I'm sure if Todd Rundgren had some sort of involvement in
> Eurovision you'd say it was the best thing since Britney
> got out of a car without any knickers on.
>
> > Both Bucks Fizz and Celine Dion needed exposure, Cliff and
> > Lulu are a different matter, both of them had their
> > careers, oveshadowed by the Beatles and the beginnings of
> > more adventrous rock, they both needed eurovision as a way
> > to reinvent themselves, raise their profile, and it
> > worked.
> > With the exception of Abba nothing really great or ground
> > breaking has ever come out of Eurovision, most of it has
> > been 1 hit wonders..... Lordi...lol
> >
> > > > well, it worked for Abba...
> > >
> > > And Bucks Fizz, Cliff Richards, Lulu and lets not forget
> > > Celine Dion.
> > >
> > > Eurovision is a good bit of nonsense once a year, with a
> > > couple of hundred million tuning in to watch it, that's a
> > > lot of people who give a toss.
|
