| re: Jims' BOOH musical is still a GO | |
|
Posted by: |
Chika 07:51 pm UTC 01/31/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Jims' BOOH musical is still a GO - Smeghead 01:15 pm UTC 01/31/09 |
| tsk, the dream engine sucked anyway! > > Well, I hope it all happens, but after the way Jim and > Rink killed The Dream Engine I have no faith until I see > rehearsals happening and tickets for sale. > > > Well, the investment is in a production company Hill Top > > Productions. Jim gave the names of his two producers in > > his blog ages ago, and one of those is a director of that > > company. So it does all hang together. > > > > Dave > > > > > There are plenty of instances of companies holding rights > > > and never exercising them... there are also occasional > > > instances of companies holding rights just so other > > > companies can't make a film. There's the infamous > > > Fantastic Four film that was made for 2 million dollars > > > and never released just so that the producers could keep > > > their rights to the characters and not let them go to > > > someone else and they then waited another decade to film > > > and release the real version. > > > > > > > Creative Entertainment Group have released a financial > > > > report on the state of the company and apart from a lot of > > > > it being a load of boring twaddle, there's a bit that > > > > isn't. > > > > > > > > "However we are maintaining our investments in our > > > > Theatrical Division's performing rights for Jim > > > > Steinman's Bat out of Hell" > > > > > > > > Seems to me that they wouldn't be maintaining their > > > > investment if it wasn't going to happen. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jims' BOOH musical is still a GO - Pudding 08:04 pm UTC 01/31/09 |
| Next: | re: Jims' BOOH musical is still a GO - Scaramouche 01:32 pm UTC 01/31/09 |
| Thread: | |