| re: Musical Love Songs |
|
Posted by:
 |
Smeghead 11:46 pm UTC 02/18/09 |
| In reply to: |
re: Musical Love Songs - Pudding 10:15 pm UTC 02/18/09 |
|
No, you are foolish if you believe that the general theater going public are going to care about hearing certain Meat Loaf songs. Meat Loaf fans as a whole aren't going to travel to London or New York to see a Bat show that doesn't have Meat in it. It has to succeed as a piece of theater, and that requires it to have a solid story and not just be a bunch of Bat songs shoehorned into a script. Like it or not it is Neverland... not the 1977 Neverland... I feel Jim will hire some script doctor who doesn't understand the show's heart and will make it more commercial and less meaningful... but at its heart it has to be a solid story to succeed.
> No, you're foolish to think that the general public really
> gives two shits about the intricacies of the story when
> all they want to hear is the songs from the Bat Out Of
> Hell albums. And if they don't hear them, the show won't
> last long at all.
>
> The only song that can't really be included in the musical
> is Objects because of CoV in TdV.
>
> Let go of the Neverland of old Smeg it aint going to
> happen, it's a new Neverland.
>
> > The presence of FCOL will not lead to the success or
> > failure of the musical. If you really believe that you
> > are very foolish.
> >
> > > > > > There is no doubt that FCOL will be in the musical.
> > > > >
> > > > I bet it is not.
> > >
> > > Then it will fail.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Musical Love Songs - Pudding 10:15 pm UTC 02/18/09 |
| Next: |
re: Musical Love Songs - Pudding 01:11 am UTC 02/19/09 |
|
| Thread: |
|