| re: Steinman and Springsteen | |
|
Posted by: |
crazy_janey 05:59 am UTC 03/08/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Steinman and Springsteen - steven_stuart 01:35 am UTC 03/08/09 |
> Ha ha. That's very funny. I tried to read it but I > couldn't understand what point she was trying to make. Is > it that the same guy who supposedly wrote Jim's music also > wrote Bruce's music? Maybe I'm just stupid. Can someone > who has read the blog explain? > > > > URL: Or you could go with the obvious answer ;-) > > > > Oh dear ... she's certainly Born To Bullshit isn't she? > > > > Dave I read this once before, and I thought she was trying to say that Bruce was inspired by Jim to write Born to Run, instead of the other way around. (Mmmm, OK.....) I read it again, and I do think she is trying to say that Jim (Who is this Jim Cypherd guy, anyway? Am I missing something?)DID write Born to Run. Okey-dokey...I guess Bruce spent over a year in the studio agonizing over work that was not his own. I think she's trying to say that the only reason Bruce gained any following is because of the hype, but that he "earned" the admiration over time. Interesting. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Steinman and Springsteen - daveake 09:52 am UTC 03/08/09 |
| Next: | re: Steinman and Springsteen - SeeingI 07:29 pm UTC 03/04/09 |
| Thread: | |