| re: Mr. Smeg is trying really hard (the poor dear) | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 08:06 pm UTC 08/04/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Mr. Smeg is trying really hard (the poor dear) - Smeghead 04:01 am UTC 08/04/09 |
| > > I don't expect you to make any kind of intelligent reply > > to my points > > Fuck you, you daft cunt. Just what I expected. At least you never surprise me. > ... if it will help remove you and your threads I can > mention 1 guy 1 jar, Tub Girl, 2 girls 1 cup, goatsee... > or whatever.... though JD said that wouldn't work... I have a feeling that you are trying to insult me but I have no idea what you are going on about or why JD said that wouldn't work. BTW, you said my Obama Vs. Palin post was an attempt at spam and bullshit (without saying why). I can assure you that it was not. It was a reasonable post and I have now received two reasonable replies. You are the one creating flame wars by saying that I am "running amok" for posting a NJC about the two favourites for the 2012 presedential election and for saying that David Sonenberg is a good manager when his group The Black Eyed Peas have just broken the record for the most consecutive weeks at number one in the Billboard Hot One Hundred Chart. No wonder Ryan has to defend himself against troublemakers like you and Pudding. Look at the amount of spam created by this thread which you started. You attacked me out of the blue for no reason. I hope you are intelligent enough to see that not everyone agreed with you. Because you are wrong. And as for your mate Pudding, he has no added Ryan to the Daft Cunt Club. So there are four of us. Me, Conas, Wordnix and Ryan. And yet none of us are daft cunts. Now he wouldn't be trying to flame with those kinds of insults, would he? | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Mr. Smeg is trying really hard (the poor dear) - Smeghead 04:01 am UTC 08/04/09 |
| Next: | re: Mr. Smeg is trying really hard (the poor dear) - Pudding 06:07 am UTC 08/04/09 |
| Thread: | |