| re: The Smeg/Egg Wars Should End! | |
|
Posted by: |
Conas 09:33 pm UTC 09/03/09 |
| In reply to: | The Smeg/Egg Wars Should End! - steven_stuart 02:21 pm UTC 09/03/09 |
| I think you guys are fighting over nothing. But when you come to the Rockman and make statements about Jim and his work people are entitled to see a little bit of proof to back up your words and statements. So far you've fallen short. I don't belive you are involved with Jim's music career in anyway like Gibson. You guys CLAIM to be associated with Jim when I'm 100% certain you're not.. and then to say your Mammy is involved seems wacked up to be honest. > Today Mr. Smeg wrote: "Bonnie's expressing Jim's > opinion... Mr. Egg does that on this board every day." > > This is absolutely not true. I believe that I have > expressed Jim's opinion four times in the last two months. > > > Once when I said that Jim liked Ted Kennedy (which is > true) and then when I said that Jim was a fan of a Michael > Jackson (which is also true). > > In addition, I said that Jim loves to blog (which most of > us know) and that he agrees with the decision not to blog > at the moment (which Smeghead called "intimate knowledge" > -but that's not what I would call "intimate knowledge" - I > am not sure what kind of writer Smeghead is). > > The other day Mr. Smeg wrote: "It doesn't matter if he's > accurate... he just likes to constantly tell everyone here > that he has intimate knowledge of Jim's likes, dislikes, > private feelings, etc.... because it makes him feel > important." > > Part of my reply was: "I am just saying that Jim loves to > blog and he will again when the time is right. That is > hardly constantly telling everyone here that I have > intimate knowledge. What I said about Jim and blogging is > stating the bleeding obvious. As usual you are making > gross exagerations and trying to start an arguement in > your own special troll like way." > > Belmont got it right when I paid tribute to Ted Kennedy > and Smeghead replied: "You sure are interested in American > Liberal politics for someone who doesn't even live in this > country..." I was very pleased that Belomont had the guts > to stand up to the bully troll, responding: "Are you > trying to start an argument?? Should it make a difference > whether he lives in this country or not??" > > Note: I am sorry to bring up all these old quotes but > Pudding did that to Conas and there were no objections. I > need to post them in order to make my case clear. > > I then posted (because of comments made by Mr. Smeg)that > nobody is controlling Jim and that he agrees with the blog > silence (one of the FOUR times I expressed Jim's > opinion). > > Mr. Smeg replied: "There you go again... claiming to have > intimate Jim knowledge... even though you deny that you do > so." > > Jim's agreement with not blogging is NOT "intimate Jim > knowledge". > > I have never claimed to have "intimate" knowledge of Jim > on this board. Especially the "private feelings" that Mr. > Smeg talks about. I may know some things about Jim (as I > am sure many of us do) but I have not divulged them on > this board and I have never claimed to be important (as > Smeghead The Broken Record keeps claiming). > > Smeghead is trying to claim that I tell members of the > board that I have intimate knowledge of private feelings. > I have never claimed any such thing on this board. > > I am sorry to bring this all up in a new thread but Mr. > Smeg flamed me again today, in the "Bonnie Tyler records > new version of TEOTH" thread. > > I am not upset or angry at Smeghead but I want to try and > set the record straight because he constantly leaves > messages that are designed to provoke me and that may give > other members the wrong idea. > > He used to call me a "lying cunt" because Susan blogged > and let everyone know that my mother is the lead producer > of Bat The Musical and that I had read the script and sent > comments about it to Jim (two things that I did not want > to divulge - Susan outed me). > > Fortunately Ryan was able to tell members that I wasn't a > "lying cunt" because there is no other way that I could > have known about him approaching the producers with > regards to his Frankenstein production (involving Jim's > music). > > The two things I regret in recent history are writing > about the DVDs of the reading and being rude to JD. I have > apologised for both of these things. > > However, I do not regret writing the things that Mr. Smeg > has siezed on and grossly exagerated. > > It would be nice if Smeg and Egg could stop any > hostilities and work together to make the board a better > place. After all, at the end of the day, we are just two > daft cunts in the same boat. > > On a lighter note, Woody Allen said: "I can't listen to > Wagner. I get the urge to invade Poland." > > > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: The Smeg/Egg Wars Should End! - Pudding 04:39 am UTC 09/04/09 |
| Next: | re: The Smeg/Egg Wars Should End! - Pudding 04:40 am UTC 09/04/09 |
| Thread: |
|