| re: Interview with Meat; possible project with Jim? | |
|
Posted by: |
ricgough 04:41 pm UTC 09/23/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Interview with Meat; possible project with Jim? - RSG 11:34 pm UTC 09/07/09 |
| I think the dichotomy meat faces here is that the real money is in touring these days, where the recorded work just creates the hype for a tour to be possible. It aint the same as it was with Bat 2, where most music listened to was directly sold to those listening to it. There are too may ways to get music without paying for it these days. Most people who were anticipating Bat 3 had it for nowt before it was even released remember. I'd like to see Meat stick to 1 off's in large venues, but I don't think that would be profitable enough to cover any outlay for the album (if not covered by sales in the allotted time) and the cost of putting the band on the road. > After odds and ends with Covallo, there will more likely > be a tour. Many will disagree with me here, I believe it > should be a very short tour. Than Meat relaxes for a > while. May be doing some shows with a month in between leg > of tours. > > If Jim and Meat worked together again again it should have > a new title. Jim should produce the music. And Eric Vetro, > Jim Steinman and Meat should work on vocals. Whether its a > couple songs or a album. I'd buy it. WPOMBHTM could really > work. But that's just what I think. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Interview with Meat; possible project with Jim? - RSG 11:34 pm UTC 09/07/09 |
| Next: | smeg head is going to hit the roof , meat and jim friends again - lotus_nz 02:36 am UTC 09/08/09 |
| Thread: | |