| re: "Steinman is to hard rock what Hitchcock is to the thriller." | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 11:55 pm UTC 01/15/10 |
| In reply to: | re: "Steinman is to hard rock what Hitchcock is to the thriller." - Jacqueline 08:34 pm UTC 01/15/10 |
| > It's the words "hard rock" that are giving you issue, I > assume? If it read - JS is to music what AH was to > movies....you'd be happier? That does sound better. I guess that Jim had to become a music producer so that he could "direct" his songs and he certainly has had a go at directing videos (even when Ken Russell was meant to be in charge). Although I'm not sure if its a good comparison in the first place. I think I prefer the Wagner comaprison. Steinman is to rock music what Wagner was to opera. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: "Steinman is to hard rock what Hitchcock is to the thriller." - Evil_One 02:08 pm UTC 01/17/10 |
| Next: | re: "Steinman is to hard rock what Hitchcock is to the thriller." - Vin 08:00 pm UTC 01/15/10 |
| Thread: | |