| re: Dave: Let Us Debate This Batmusical Hypocrisy | |
|
Posted by: |
besty 11:49 pm UTC 03/25/10 |
| In reply to: | Dave: Let Us Debate This Batmusical Hypocrisy - steven_stuart 11:16 pm UTC 03/25/10 |
| That's all very well, but what are your views on lesbian priests? > In response to Dave saying that my posts are boring, I > wrote: > > > > I couldn't find anything you said on > > > Batmusical that would make an interesting quote. > > Dave's reply was: > > > The board isn't there so you can quote it here. > > Dave, would it be better just to talk about what is said > instead of actually printing direct quotes? Because I have > seen many examples of Batmusical members talking about > what I (and others) have said on this board (and the Meat > Loaf board). The latest post on Batmusical is by Bullwhip > (is he banned from here?). It was posted today. He has a > direct go at me. To make matters worse, in the same post, > he has a go at Jim, claiming that he hasn't done anything > for years (which is not true). > > Smeghead practically follows everything I say on this > board and insists on insulting me. What about the "Andrew > William Oglanby's Knowledge Of The Script" thread and just > yesterday he was saying that Jim should fire Elva and > David Sonenberg. > > It is hypocritical to complain about mentioning Batmusical > on this board when your members do something very similar > over there. > > I don't actually see the difference between quoting from a > web page, Susan's blog (which you did on this board, you > hypocrit, letting everyone know I was Elva's son), > Wikipedia or another forum. Who makes the rules? AndrewG > said that I was childish to quote Meat Loaf on this board > and thank goodness Conas was the voice of reason who said > that my actions were justifiable. > > You make it impossible for me to reply to the things that > people like Bullwhip and Smeghead say about me on > Batmusical because of a personal grudge that you have > aginst me. Even when I answer in a polite and diplomatic > way, you remove my posts and ban me. > > It is also impossible to defend against the negative > remarks that Batmusical members make about the show. The > forum is meant to be a "BOOH The Musical" fansite but it > is often an "Anti-BOOH The Muiscal" fansite. If I am > silenced at Batmusical, then the only way I can defend > either myself, another poster from this board, Jim, JD > (there have been a few ugly remarks about her from people > like Smeghead), Elva or the other producers is to talk > about it on this board. > > How else will people from this board who have read the > remarks on Batmusical hear the other side of the story? > > I don't expect a proper reply from you. You will say that > this post is too long or too boring (which is a rather > cowardly way to escape reasonable debate). You will pick > one sentence to debate or you will simply yawn. > > But just be honest for once. Read the things you and > others have said at Batmusical. Like when I said about > Kasim on this board, did you not discuss my remark over > there? Yes you did. And yet I am not allowed to mention > Wordnix here? > > Did you post on Batmusical that 70% of everything I say is > bullshit? And then you say that there should be no quotes > from your board here. That Dave, is hypocritical. > > When I told Klasien that I didn't want a war with you, I > meant it. I would love it if you would stop attacking me > or at least enter into civilised debate. > > Perhaps you could lift the ban on me at Batmusical so that > I can post defences against vile remarks. Like one of your > members saying that Elva has Jim's balls in a vice. > > If Bullwhip says that Jim has done nothing for years, then > what are you scared of if I reply to it on the forum at > Batmusical? > > Elva has done nothing wrong to you. Jim has done nothing > wrong to you. You are supposed to be running a website > that is in favour of their show. > > Oh and by the way Dave, as far as my posts being boring, I > know people who would disagree with you, including some > quite important ones. I have been trying to find > interesting posts from you but I haven't had much luck. > Perhaps it is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. > Maybe we are both boring. Who knows? Why say it? > > Perhaps we should debate this via email but there are many > quotes on Batmusical which are untrue and offensive (not > just to me but to Jim, the producers and even JD). I know > for a fact that many members of this community (as well as > other internet users) read the posts on Batmusical. Since > you will not let me post on Batmusical, I feel that > posting here is the only way that people who have read the > unfair quotes can hear my attempt to defend myself or to > defend others like Jim, Elva or David Sonenberg. Emails to > you would not give those who have read what amounts to > libel the other side of the story. > > I am not going to make a habit of quoting Batmusical but I > won't be told that there is one rule for Batmuiscal and a > different rule for this board. > > I probably wouldn't have bothered with this rant if you > hadn't made the extremely hypocritical remark: "The board > isn't there so you can quote it here." One rule for you > and a different one for me. > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Dave: Let Us Debate This Batmusical Hypocrisy - steven_stuart 03:21 pm UTC 03/28/10 |
| Next: | re: Dave: Let Us Debate This Batmusical Hypocrisy - EvilNickname 08:21 am UTC 03/26/10 |
| Thread: |
|