| re: Bring back Pudding and Smeghead! | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 01:17 am UTC 08/26/10 |
| In reply to: | re: Bring back Pudding and Smeghead! - AndrewG 07:15 pm UTC 08/23/10 |
| > Well that doesn't make any sense because how else would > anyone believe what you are talking about? Or are you > saying you are now only posting this stuff because Dave > outed you. In either case your reasoning to post seems > strange and given the fact nothing can be backed up by > hard evidence from any source at the moment you can't deny > it's right for people to question your claims. Of course people can question. Why not? But I am really not interested in making any claims. I wasn't thinking about the show and Rob asked me some questions. I did my best to answer him without spilling too many beans. Then I compared "Bat" to "Tanz" because someone posted that "Tanz" was produced much faster and I don't think that particular comparison should be made because they are such different productions. Most of what I said doesn't really need to be backed up. A lot of it is stating the bleeding obvious. A lot of it has been written by others in the past. I'm surprised it agitates you. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Bring back Pudding and Smeghead! - AndrewG 07:15 pm UTC 08/23/10 |
| Next: | Some officail clarifaction(and getting a rant of my chest) - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 04:12 pm UTC 08/22/10 |
| Thread: | |