| re: an apology to Jim - no reply required | |
|
Posted by: |
Klasien 12:21 pm UTC 01/13/12 |
| In reply to: | re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - LordRahl 12:34 pm UTC 01/12/12 |
| hmmm... wonder what this makes you... nah, who cares! and besides... it works, right??? LOL -K- Warning: May contain traces of bitch. > Yes, "dear". You are an attention seeking kid. The way > you post a sarcastic jab at Jim about not releasing music > then spend hours apologizing shows it quite clearly. > > Good for you! ;) > > > > > > yes, dear, > > > > that no reply thing was meant for you. > > > > > > So what? You've never said or posted anything you wish you > > hadn't? > > I've had to take a good look at myself lately and decided > > I didn't like who I was becoming. But what is done is > > done. All I can do is apologize and move on. Time and my > > actions will tell whether I can change. > > > > Or perhaps you guys are right and I simply am an > > attention-seeking kid. > > > > -K- > > Warning: may contain traces of bitch. > > > > > > > > huh? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jim, > > > > > > > > I just wanted to take up 2 seconds of your time to > > > > apologize for the comment I posted yesterday in reply to > > > > Scaramouche's Batman post. > > > > I had no right and no reason for what was intended as a > > > > tongue-in-cheek comment that came out totally wrong. > > > > > > > > I should know better than to think I have the right to > > > > speak to you in that manner and really regretted making > > > > the comment from the moment I read it back and realised > > > > exactly what I had said and how it would be interpreted. > > > > > > > > I wish you nothing but the best, both personally and > > > > professionally, obviously for reasons both noble and > > > > selfish, and hope that the occasional ramblings from fans > > > > who consider you and (or perhaps through) your music to be > > > > among the most important influences and people in their > > > > lives do not stop you from 'staying in the trenches' with > > > > us. > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Klasien > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - LordRahl 12:34 pm UTC 01/12/12 |
| Next: | re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - Conas 11:52 am UTC 01/11/12 |
| Thread: | |