HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: an apology to Jim - no reply required

Posted by:
Klasien 12:21 pm UTC 01/13/12
In reply to: re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - LordRahl 12:34 pm UTC 01/12/12

hmmm...

wonder what this makes you...
nah, who cares!

and besides... it works, right??? LOL

-K-
Warning: May contain traces of bitch.

> Yes, "dear". You are an attention seeking kid. The way
> you post a sarcastic jab at Jim about not releasing music
> then spend hours apologizing shows it quite clearly.
>
> Good for you! ;)
>
>
> >
> > yes, dear,
> >
> > that no reply thing was meant for you.
> >
> >
> > So what? You've never said or posted anything you wish you
> > hadn't?
> > I've had to take a good look at myself lately and decided
> > I didn't like who I was becoming. But what is done is
> > done. All I can do is apologize and move on. Time and my
> > actions will tell whether I can change.
> >
> > Or perhaps you guys are right and I simply am an
> > attention-seeking kid.
> >
> > -K-
> > Warning: may contain traces of bitch.
> >
> > >
> > > huh?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Dear Jim,
> > > >
> > > > I just wanted to take up 2 seconds of your time to
> > > > apologize for the comment I posted yesterday in reply to
> > > > Scaramouche's Batman post.
> > > > I had no right and no reason for what was intended as a
> > > > tongue-in-cheek comment that came out totally wrong.
> > > >
> > > > I should know better than to think I have the right to
> > > > speak to you in that manner and really regretted making
> > > > the comment from the moment I read it back and realised
> > > > exactly what I had said and how it would be interpreted.
> > > >
> > > > I wish you nothing but the best, both personally and
> > > > professionally, obviously for reasons both noble and
> > > > selfish, and hope that the occasional ramblings from fans
> > > > who consider you and (or perhaps through) your music to be
> > > > among the most important influences and people in their
> > > > lives do not stop you from 'staying in the trenches' with
> > > > us.
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > Klasien
> > > >


reply |

Previous: re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - LordRahl 12:34 pm UTC 01/12/12
Next: re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - Conas 11:52 am UTC 01/11/12

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE