| re: for jacqueline | |
|
Posted by: |
Klasien 02:53 pm UTC 04/12/12 |
| In reply to: | re: for jacqueline - daveake 01:02 pm UTC 04/12/12 |
| Really cool, Dave, THANKS!!! Nice to re-read that... wish he would have stayed on! -K- > See linky > > > That must've been while I was away - what handle did he > > use? > > > > A > > > > > Yeah, he also posted on the forum a few times... though it > > > took us a while to believe it was really him... > > > > > > :) > > > > > > -K- > > > > > > > Something slightly similar to this was attempted a few > > > > years back. Upon Jim beginning his blog he regularly would > > > > use it to interact with fans from this site, discussing > > > > topics from Bat 3 to horror movies. Then it became a > > > > vehicle for mostly his political opinion and finally ended > > > > altogether. Word went around that some posters here posted > > > > some negative things that upset Jim, which could have in > > > > deed been the case. I think it was more a higher up, an > > > > agent intervened. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: for jacqueline - Klasien 05:00 pm UTC 04/23/12 |
| Next: | re: for jacqueline - Klasien 07:46 pm UTC 04/10/12 |
| Thread: | |