not logged in
| re: Website Article Here on jimsteinman.com | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 07:10 pm UTC 05/02/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Website Article Here on jimsteinman.com - Markus 10:27 am UTC 05/02/07 |
> Jacqueline, I really appreciate everything you did and > still do for us. You know that. And you know that I am > like you against banning people and mods. > But I think Iīll take a step back from RR (the only board > I visit on a daily basis) as long as Susan goes on writing > those utter bullshit without any proof. > I said this myself: Stop replying to shit like this and it > will stop. But sometime you just canīt be quiet. And > thatīs the reason why I HAVE TO make this step. > > I think Smeg and some others are right this time. I wonder > why we have this login system when someone can come along > and insist on things like this over and over again!? > Itīs www.jimsteinman.com and not some unimportant site > like www.insanelily.org > > Ah well, you know what I mean. Thank you for everything > Jacqueline. > > Markus. Markus, When I IM'd you, you reduced the potential stature of our dialogue to your question, "What is your favorite position" and told me without my asking, that you are not the guy for me. I think that is understood, and I didn't like the sexual leanings you made onto me. Aside from that, you rode my attempts at friendliness with insults and derisions and threats, "If you come up with your bullshit again I'll tell the others I was in touch with you" You said it again, and called it an offer. I understood what you meant by "bullshit" and since the understanding at the time was fictional posts that I did not make myself, there was no danger of my reproducing same, and your "offer" stood true. I eventually removed you from my buddy list, seeing you were no "buddy" of mine. Before that, you and I had never met, not prior to the board. I never posted as any name at any board prior to the Rockman Record in 2005. Not any Meatloaf or other music board. I had no idea what to expect on such boards, and the things I understood then were not things that I was to come to learn through your behaviors. I didn't know you, you didn't know me, in any context, before. But you took a hostile stance that I would suggest something, and you were the first to both ask and say, "Answer me this one simple question" in category, and expounded, acknowledging, that I am not a young kid making up boyfriends, and wondering, why I am doing this? You know something Markus, for the good of my senses of what was wrong and what could be right, is probably my best reason, and you don't know me to tell me I do not speak with sincerity. Behind these walls of digits, you can't know one person from another, you must make intellectual judgements based on your common sense, that common sense which includes acknowledgements of unusual people in unusual circumstances do unusual things sometimes, and that there is a world of variations, some things controversial, some things to be established that have not yet been established. There is a big world, with big muddy facts all over it, and nothing in life is so simple. Behind digits, you can't know what is what to make judgements that affect other peoples' lives. Your opinions have the simulation of muscle, you say you will hurt Jacqueline by stepping away from the board if she does not do as you want her to do, but you are not really looking at all the factors. You took no time to know me, no time to investigate with intellence, and no time to like me. If I was like Yoko, to John, in the seventies, I would suffer no different fate than the one I am having now. I don't compare myself to her; I only compare the situation. People would have booted her off of forums in a New York minute. She had an affect on their John. On their image of John, experience of John, on their homogeneious perception of all things perfect in John. John is not like Jim. There is no comparison between those two men. John was honest about all the things he was, and Jim has been stuck in the shadows without much of people knowing of him at all. He is bold in one tenth of his life experience, and he has the means by which to be bolder. I do not make demands that he be what he is not, but he is being too much and he knows it. He has ten percent here, ten percent there, another ten percent there, and his cry to me was, "I have no personal life!" No, this is not on tape. I can't upload the mp3 for you. But I am his friend. We've been lifelong best friends. I gladly go the distance for him. You can gladly step aside if that is your only sensibiliy, or you can make an effort to be more than a fan, and be a friend, too. I have no doubts that I have certain misgivings on what a fan is supposed to be, but you are here, on his own territory of appreciation, and if you want to enjoy all of him, which is the implication, it takes more than performing songs he has written, critiquing voices that sing them, and sharing files. You asked a question, one simple question, like it was your quota. But there are alot of questions to ask, and I don't understand why you don't ask them. Be a mench. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Website Article Here on jimsteinman.com - Markus 10:27 am UTC 05/02/07 |
| Next: | re: Website Article Here on jimsteinman.com - Markus 09:03 pm UTC 05/02/07 |
| Thread: |
|