> > The fact that he NOW is talking about recording with Jim
> > again is the icing on the cake.
>
> Who's cake?, cos reading Jims blog, it seems like Jim aint
> so keen. It would be nice if it did happen, I can only see
> an handful of songs (5 or 6) though being done and not a
> full on album.
>
> Pud
Jim made reference to unrecorded songs for Bat, which has not yet been begun production........it is not that there aren't any songs. Whether or not there is a relationship, is the most salient point. I'm not happy with the presentment that Meat is making.....if I was a sixteen year old fan it would seem all too believable, but I've seasoned quite a bit since then, and realize that it takes two to agree on something, not one. What bothers me is that so many people are as experienced with such news as I was as a sixteen year old fan (of anything). I think that talking to lawyers makes the largest problems, not solves them. Meat is saving face, and making a disgrace of all his other actions. I've read alot of Meat bashing in the past, and I'm ready to grab a post. However, for Jim's sake, I'll sit demurely and wait.
|
