| re: COM hits the charts ... | |
|
Posted by: |
Pudding 09:10 am UTC 05/10/07 |
| In reply to: | re: COM hits the charts ... - Wilbury 08:13 am UTC 05/10/07 |
| It's all personal opinion, but I think BaaB is a stronger song, plus it has the word 'Bat' in the title, which might or might not be a factor. Break It to me sucks, I can't stand it, never have and never will. It's in the bin with Lemon as 'songs to skip' Whatever our personal choices would be for 1st, 2nd or 3rd single, I think we're all in pretty much agreement that IACBTMN was a dumb fuck of an idea as a lead off song and COM is just plain toliet gunge. Pud > Fuck that, I would have gone with Alive, then a less > self-indulgent mix of Break It and perhaps then BaaB as > third. It has "third single" written all over it. > > But if this goes to show anything, then it's just HOW > badly the screwed up in single choice -- what with all the > options they had. > > > > > > It's becoming more and more clear that TMIL is a lost > > > cause. If it doesn't take off now, it'll never take off. > > > > I think you might be right. > > > > The album still could take off though (always the > > optimist) if Meat and the executives pulled their heads > > out from up their asses and marketted the album properly. > > > > IACBTMN should NEVER have been the first single, that was > > a huge mistake, now COM as a single will solidify the > > publics impression that the album is boring. Most people > > agreed that from the word go Bad For Good, Blind As A Bat > > and Future should've been the singles, Future because of > > Jennifer Hudson used as an Oscar Winner. > > > > Pud | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: COM hits the charts ... - Wilbury 08:13 am UTC 05/10/07 |
| Next: | re: COM hits the charts ... - Wilbury 09:48 am UTC 05/10/07 |
| Thread: |
|