HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: COM hits the charts ...

Posted by:
Pudding 09:10 am UTC 05/10/07
In reply to: re: COM hits the charts ... - Wilbury 08:13 am UTC 05/10/07

It's all personal opinion, but I think BaaB is a stronger song, plus it has the word 'Bat' in the title, which might or might not be a factor. Break It to me sucks, I can't stand it, never have and never will. It's in the bin with Lemon as 'songs to skip'

Whatever our personal choices would be for 1st, 2nd or 3rd single, I think we're all in pretty much agreement that IACBTMN was a dumb fuck of an idea as a lead off song and COM is just plain toliet gunge.

Pud

> Fuck that, I would have gone with Alive, then a less
> self-indulgent mix of Break It and perhaps then BaaB as
> third. It has "third single" written all over it.
>
> But if this goes to show anything, then it's just HOW
> badly the screwed up in single choice -- what with all the
> options they had.
>
>
>
> > > It's becoming more and more clear that TMIL is a lost
> > > cause. If it doesn't take off now, it'll never take off.
> >
> > I think you might be right.
> >
> > The album still could take off though (always the
> > optimist) if Meat and the executives pulled their heads
> > out from up their asses and marketted the album properly.
> >
> > IACBTMN should NEVER have been the first single, that was
> > a huge mistake, now COM as a single will solidify the
> > publics impression that the album is boring. Most people
> > agreed that from the word go Bad For Good, Blind As A Bat
> > and Future should've been the singles, Future because of
> > Jennifer Hudson used as an Oscar Winner.
> >
> > Pud


reply |

Previous: re: COM hits the charts ... - Wilbury 08:13 am UTC 05/10/07
Next: re: COM hits the charts ... - Wilbury 09:48 am UTC 05/10/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE