| re: One Question Not to Answer |
|
Posted by:
 |
Markus 11:42 am UTC 12/28/06 |
| In reply to: |
One Question Not to Answer - Rabe 11:08 am UTC 12/28/06 |
|
Well, you did a good job to bring it up again. Don´t understand this.
Markus.
> The one about Jim's sexuality is one that I think
> shouldn't even be asked and I'm glad to see that Jim's not
> answering it.
>
> Why?
>
> Because what the hell does it matter what sexual
> orientation he is? Does that change a single note or word
> of one of his songs?
>
> Not atfuckinall!
>
> So for all those who are about this - get a damned life!
>
> Sheesh.
>
> find something else to care about. Like when the Dream
> Engine album is coming out.
>
> Rabe...
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: One Question Not to Answer - Pudding 07:07 pm UTC 12/28/06 |
| Next: |
re: One Question Not to Answer - angie 11:32 am UTC 12/28/06 |
|
| Thread: |
|