HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: One more review of Braver

Posted by:
steven_stuart 02:41 am UTC 09/21/16
In reply to: One more review of Braver - Marklbetya 08:42 pm UTC 09/19/16

I think it's an interesting album for several reasons but it really is very different from BOOH and BOOH 2 and even Dead Ringer. But I am glad that they at least tried this experiment.

> MY BRAVER REVIEW
> 1) Who Needs the Young. Not a good song for Meat’s voice.
> My wife hit the nail on the head when she said he
> sounded like the Grinch in an animated cartoon. This has
> the potential to be a looooong CD.
> 2) Going All the Way is Just a Start. Refreshing and
> surprising change. Meats voice suits this song nicely,
> and when he does duets, you still have that tonal quality
> you need for a Steinman song while other voices can carry
> the melody. This is a very Steinmanesque song and
> arrangement, and of course it’s great to hear Karla and
> Ellen. If nothing else, this will probably make the
> album worthwhile.
> 3) Speaking in Tongues. While I think this “gospelly”
> song also suits Meat’s voice, the music doesn’t feel like
> Steinman to me. The lyrics, certainly do, but it doesn’t
> feel to me like part of a Bat Trilogy. The song may grow
> on me.
> 4) Loving You’s a Dirty Job. A reasonable version.
> Interesting to see the male/female role reversal from
> Bonnie Tyler. And this is a good song for the
> angry/gravelly voice (like Jim’s version of Left in the
> Dark), so Meat’s voice does work on this song...at least
> until the end. The last verse was a little shaky. I
> prefer Bonnie’s version, but I wouldn’t skip this track
> when listening to this CD.
> 5) Souvenirs. There is no doubt in my mind a preliminary
> version of 2 out of 3 Ain’t Bad. From starting with
> “Baby” and the “crying icicles instead of tears”, sending
> outside into the cold night, and breaking up. And even the
> line: “Take my soul, You can have my mind, But you're
> never gonna get your hands on my love.” There is 2 out of
> 3, literally. It also seems to have the same lyrical
> and timing qualities of Left in the Dark during other
> verses as well. I like the song, but it just seems like
> earlier works that have evolved in to two, stronger works.
> I prefer the Steinman online demo version on Youtube.
> 6) Only When I Feel. What is this? I’ve never been a fan
> of this song. This is somewhat painful to listen to.
> It seems like a reprisal of something from a broadway
> musical. And it doesn’t have that Steinman feel to the
> music again.
> 7) More. Maybe it’s me. When I think of the best
> Steinman, I hear a piano, not electrical music. To me,
> this is the “If it’s not Broke, break it” of the album.
> I’ll be skipping this one. I like the female refrain
> enough, but not that much. And it certainly goes on
> longer than necessary.
> 8) This seems like another one-off from a musical that
> doesn’t fit. This is the song that the army would sing as
> they march off to war in a musical. It’s not even a
> song, in that nobody in their right mind would release
> this for radio play. It’s like a novelty song with a drum
> beat and not much more. I would never had guessed this
> was a Steinman composition.
> 9) Skull of Your Country. Similar to Souvenirs, there are
> parts in here that eventually made it to “Total Eclipse of
> the Heart”. Again, we’re just listening to a work in
> progress that evolved into a much more polished song. I
> wouldn’t say I don’t like it. It clearly does sound like
> a Steinman song and arrangement, so it’s clearly worth
> listening to, but it’s a shell of Eclipse.
> 10) I think I like this. It’s more commercial that most
> of the songs on this album, but it definitely has the
> Steinman lyrics we’ve come to expect. More rock/drums
> than piano, which as you probably figured by now is my
> taste, but Meat’s vocals work here at least.
>
> Overall, I would say it was about what I expected after
> hearing some of the leaked items. Disappointing, in that
> I still had hopes of something remarkable that I hadn’t
> heard before. But there is nothing new here, and Meat’s
> vocal qualities can’t elevate this to new heights.
>
> I still love Meat’s voice, and think when he’s doing a
> duet of Steinman works, we can still imagine how they were
> meant to be sung, but I think I’m going to go listen to
> Bat out of Hell for the 50,000th time instead.
>
> I wish them both well, and will never be able to repay Jim
> or Meat for the hours of joy they’ve given me, but it’s
> over. Jim isn’t writing much new, and Meat is pretty much
> done. It was quite a ride though.
>
> Thanks guys.
>


reply |

Previous: One more review of Braver - Marklbetya 08:42 pm UTC 09/19/16
Next: Braver Than We Are - Markus 08:03 pm UTC 09/19/16

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE