not logged in
| re: Been Having So Much Fun, Thanks! | |
Posted by:  |
rockfenris2005 04:10 pm UTC 04/21/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Been Having So Much Fun, Thanks! - pidunk 03:10 pm UTC 04/21/07 |
> If Jim were Celine Dion I would be very worried about alot > of things. I am certain that he is not Celine Dion. But I > think she had a great success with one of his songs. Denial tut-tut-tut-tut-tut... > > Jim Steinman who was born in 1947 did indeed attend this > school and the person with the yearbook probably has a > photo of him in the book and has that to show. Fine. > Except that he did not go on to Amherst. Someone else did. No they didn't. There is only *ONE* Jim Steinman. You are BONKERS! Don't make me bring out the Mad Hatter again. The Rockman already have a splitting headache. > You may think that a juvenile entering a college using > someone else's records might be a bad thing, but it was a > desperate measure of several levels of necessities. Wrong again. Jim lied to the admissions office at Amherst saying he wrote an opera of "Blue Hills Of Kentucky" or some such. He lied his way in. Jim has talked about his admission into Amherst many, many times, as have people around him who find the story amusing. Your story is not EVEN amusing. It is utter rubbish. It is not a crime to attend a school using > someone elses' name. It was probably a hard decision for > either of the boys to make at the time, and it was made > without any awareness of mine at the time. You just keep pushing it... > > I am not giving any issues towards any of the facts > concerning the purchase of the rights to The Dream Engine, > or its composition. There is no argument here. Except that "The Dream Engine" is nothing like "The Rocky Horror Show" as according to your 881-paged eye-bleed on the site that kills all eyes. > > > There is more than that which is the history. No, there isn't. You are a douche bag. > I don't like it by the way, that Demian is not releasing > access to the recordings of those compositions. He's not releasing it because he is honouring an agreement. If he violates that agreement, he will open himself to litigation. Something you should ALSO ponder, yes, SUSAN, LITIGATION. It's NOT a nice word. > > This is the part where things get more mirky. Richard > Smith is not the one who was involved with Rocky Horror. > He is pretending that he was. Histories he has convoluted > as factual are lies, and he lies and lies and lies. Yes, I > could believe that Smith was fired from Jesus Christ > Superstar. O'Brien however, not Smith, had numerous other > works in London Theatre. Smith is a name we go feh to. What are you trying to say? Who wrote the musical then? Snow White? No, Lucifer the Cat from "Cinderella". I heard he also did ghost-writing on that Andrew Lloyd Webber musical. I won't go into that crazy > thing right now. It is a mess. Why not? You've messed this board up enough, why don't you truly mess it. Except this time, people are going to sneer and laugh at you as you make a royal fool out of yourself. It's your pride, not mine, go ahead. Don't expect me to believe all the phlegm substance you spew everywhere. > > I look like I am twisted as long as you are not > understanding what I am saying. Smith=dog turd, > O'Brien=talented guy, Smith is not O'Brien. Let's just > leave it at that for now if you can get that much of what > I am saying. Smith IS O'Brien. Smith called himself O'Brien because Smith was too common. It's a common fact in Rocky Horror history. > > Too many people are lying. > Right, yeah, then if that's the case, it would be like NASA. Celine Dion would hire goonies to hunt you down and shut you up. Your site hasn't even been removed. > > I cannot begin to tell you how sick and tired I am of this > too. Good, then shut up and piss off. >There are people who might say they think I'm a > psycho because they know I'm not. That's where it gets > complicated. Absolutely, considering that sentence doesn't even make sense. > > Especially them. I describe in detail the entire > development of that community. Yeah, and it's utter bulltwang. It's rubbish. It's bile of the lowest order. > > What do you have to do with it? You bitched and whined and carried on about poor Angie Winterbottom, splashing her mug-shots all over the forum until one thinks it's an adult contemporary soft-porn page. > > In this situation, there is nothing that I can do to alter > what is true and what is not. What I do know, is that > there are too many people indeed lying, and that is an > awful thing. People are strange and behave strangely > sometimes. The world isn't always the place we think it > is. The person who is hurting others is the one taking > their credit from someone deserving. There wasn't supposed > to be any Richard O'Brien taking credit for Rocky Horror > in this way that a cult would surround him. There's a > whole background to this that is appalling. But it is not > Jim's fault, not my fault, and is something that has > persisted with an unrelenting strength. Do you think > someone is going to say to me, 'kay, we'll get it right > now? No. You are not them. They are not you. You have a > higher sense of propriety. You have more to love, than > they do. > > "Time for reflection." | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Been Having So Much Fun, Thanks! - rockfenris2005 04:12 pm UTC 04/22/07 |
| Next: | re: Been Having So Much Fun, Thanks! - pidunk 02:30 pm UTC 04/21/07 |
| Thread: | |