| re: Takers? | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 04:04 am UTC 05/10/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Takers? - tealcyfre 02:48 am UTC 05/10/07 |
> At present as I understand the situation from what's been > publicly related, there are agreements previously > negotiated as to partitioning of rights, etc. If the > parties are willing to entertain the possibility of > working together and it may be necessary to renegotiate, > the first thing one does is pick up the phone, talk to > one's lawyer and say, hey, ring up the other side, see if > they want to talk. If there's will, it isn't difficult. > The Lord of Negotations created Sherpas for a reason :) Yes, and I want also to emphasize the point that we are dealing with issues that have been publicly related and which I do not, as a not-all-that-detached observer, do question as to its reliability. I think what we face is a partitioning of squabbles, more aptly measurable than rights. I like the Lord of Negotiations, but the Lord of Friendship has to get first dibs! :) | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Takers? - tealcyfre 02:48 am UTC 05/10/07 |
| Next: | Extra Mature Gorgonzola...!. - Scaramouche 06:52 pm UTC 05/09/07 |
| Thread: | |