| re: Do You Like When Jim Sings His Own Songs? | |
|
Posted by: |
Smeghead 10:55 am UTC 05/12/07 |
| In reply to: | Do You Like When Jim Sings His Own Songs? - pidunk 08:19 am UTC 05/12/07 |
| Susan only posted this to try and start shit again with her crap that Jim sang all of BFG and played Drums and all her other shit but claim she's just discussing things. She's just a trouble maker and insane. She annoys me so much. I wish JD would ban her but apparently that's not to be. Here's my answer to your leading question: Yes I like it when Jim sings his own songs but no he did not sing the songs you know damn well he didn't and you are just trying to start trouble because you are an unbanned troll... God how I hate you. > > [Those carefully avoiding the answer of my posts, I > know you lurk. Those with snide comments, I know you shall > be snide. Anyone else, I invite to a happy > discussion.] > > Songwriters in singing their own songs, whether in good or > not-so-good voice, has always been the pinnacle of respect > in my opinion, because they put it on the line for their > music. Even though Jim did not sing most of his songs, > those that he has sung, are so much greater dimensioned to > me than the others. When someone sings, (those of you who > do sing will relate with this) their highest level of > vulnerability is sometimes the way they feel about others' > opinions of their voices. A singer could be as good as any > of the Three Tenors, and yet screech on purpose in front > of those who might judge, for fear of the real opinion > coming forth. They'd be virtual daredevils in all other > aspects of their lives, but for that. If you've > experienced that as a singer, then you know how much nerve > it takes to get out there and sing......your songs, or the > songs of others' compositions. One reason why I don't > criticize singers' qualities is because I feel that I do > not want to be the one to drop the salt into that > vulnerable place. Professional or not, the reason many > singers sing is not because they think they are the second > great wonder of the world, but because the singing gives > them joy. Some singers feel like there is no higher > pleasure other than sex. > > When Jim sings his songs, his performance levels vary with > numerous factors. When someone mistakes another singer for > him, wherever the mistake began, do you think it to be > good news to find Jim as the vocalist, after all? When > someone wants to pay homage to Rory Dodd, why not explain > this unexplained fascination? > > Rory is a male soprano, not a falsetto. Anyone want to > discuss singing technicality with me? If you know more > than I do, which is not the greatest unlikelihood, then we > could have a lively educational discussion. > > Anyway, I love it when Jim sings his songs. Don't you? > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | I think Meat Loaf is an egg - Pudding 09:15 pm UTC 05/12/07 |
| Next: | re: Do You Like When Jim Sings His Own Songs? - GTKarber 05:26 pm UTC 05/12/07 |
| Thread: |
|