HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

Those are two completely different thing, reprising a song in an album / show is not "recycling"!?!

Posted by:
Wilbury 01:16 pm UTC 05/12/07
In reply to: re: What did you think the first time you... - pidunk 11:05 am UTC 05/12/07

You're joking aren't you??

You can't seriously say that reprising a section of a song from the same album is part of the same "practice" as re-using a chord structure, riff, melody, or lyric in another work with a different title in a different context?!?

>
>
> The first time I heard that practise was while listening
> to Bad For Good CD for the first time and the Stark-Lost
> Boys Golden Girls Tie-in. It was the first time I
> considered that Jim really had something to say in his
> works. I felt it was very deep. Why would the singer be
> different between these songs which they are not?
>
>
>
>
> >
> > ... heard a piece by Steinman recycled in another song?
> > The first experience I had was discovering "Holding Out
> > For A Hero" which had the same opening riff as "Stark
> > Raving Love". I thought it was amusing. Plus I really
> > liked how "Lost Boys" was reprised in "Stark". Ever since
> > then, it's become part of the Steinman tradition. If
> > there's nothing recycled, you are in a little shock...
> >


reply |

Previous: re: What did you think the first time you... - pidunk 11:05 am UTC 05/12/07
Next: re: Those are two completely different thing, reprising a song in an album / show is not "recyc ... - pidunk 09:35 pm UTC 05/12/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE