| re: Chris Sokol question? | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 01:13 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Chris Sokol question? - rockfenris2005 12:32 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
Do you know what this is? Why don't you describe it for the ladies and gentlemen on the board? > > > > > > I'm trying to formulate a question that goes something > > like this: Why the spanking spirits are there so many > > demos????? > > My understanding of demos comes into a few areas. To be a > > representation by a non-performing songwriter selling a > > song to an artist; to be a preliminary sample of a > > proposed album by an artist to an A&R rep at a label; to > > procure financing for producers of a stage production; and > > to place a song on a shelf for future production > > possibilities. The readings I have been doing are > > developing to a preponderence of demos that I can't find > > logical reasons for. If a prior performance of a song is > > recorded, THAT recording is a DEMO. A demo is a basic > > thing. If an artist sees a title in a catalogue and has > > not heard it, and he wants to hear it he might say, is > > there a DEMO? The DEMO could be a prior performance, or it > > could be a purposed recording of a demo. So, why are there > > demos on top of demos? Aren't these just unreleased > > recordings, IMHO, instead? > > > > Just want to get the ideas straight about what is being > > referred to. > > > > > > > >
> > Sorry, I couldn't help myself > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Chris Sokol question? - rockfenris2005 12:32 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| Next: | re: Chris Sokol question? - rockfenris2005 01:23 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| Thread: |
|