| re: Chris Sokol question? | |
|
Posted by: |
rockfenris2005 12:32 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Chris Sokol question? - pidunk 12:10 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
> > I'm trying to formulate a question that goes something > like this: Why the spanking spirits are there so many > demos????? > My understanding of demos comes into a few areas. To be a > representation by a non-performing songwriter selling a > song to an artist; to be a preliminary sample of a > proposed album by an artist to an A&R rep at a label; to > procure financing for producers of a stage production; and > to place a song on a shelf for future production > possibilities. The readings I have been doing are > developing to a preponderence of demos that I can't find > logical reasons for. If a prior performance of a song is > recorded, THAT recording is a DEMO. A demo is a basic > thing. If an artist sees a title in a catalogue and has > not heard it, and he wants to hear it he might say, is > there a DEMO? The DEMO could be a prior performance, or it > could be a purposed recording of a demo. So, why are there > demos on top of demos? Aren't these just unreleased > recordings, IMHO, instead? > > Just want to get the ideas straight about what is being > referred to. > > >
Sorry, I couldn't help myself | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Chris Sokol question? - pidunk 12:10 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| Next: | re: Chris Sokol question? - pidunk 01:13 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| Thread: |
|