not logged in
| re: Dance In My Pants | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 11:09 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Dance In My Pants - GTKarber 05:49 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
> Susan, this is great. You know how when we mention things > which are easily verifiable, for example, who sang on what > song, Such as Rory Dodd where Jim actually sings? Sources which are "easily verifiable" are as questionable as anyone's claim of authenticity including my own. I have no claim on virtual god-like authority as reality. However, I am honest and truthful. I won't say to you what I have not come to believe fully and well myself based upon my own standards. My own standards are developed from the years of my upbringing in which I was taught to be discerning above all, of all sources, and measure the efficacy of truth from sources that are deemed accurate by their physical/aural/logical constructs of perceptions in corroboration with them, such as sight, sound, and sequential reasonability of facts available to know. By verifiable sources, sir, I do not exist. Therefore, I do hope that you should understand I have sensitivity where facts and fictioned verifications are concerned in this society which we as a people together have inherited. That said, as I have gone along I have in fact been giving sources here, and asked for sources and been denied that courtesy. To whatever extent there is of your own contribution, from you sir, I have a large amount of ATTITUDE and not much else. You, who look like a certain font in text on a grey board to me, are assumed to be made of flesh blood and bone. I extend that courtesy of assumption towards you as I am entitled to likewise. Thus, you could politely acknowledge that I do cite sources, and with this at this juncture, I have all the belief in my heart that you want to shoot down whatever I say....so you are asking me, Tell us what angle to strike you at. If you are really interested sir in what I have to say, I believe you would see the lack of substance brought about by others to the board and to me, and tell me, gee, this is different, are you sure? But you don't. You, pixels grey, do not give this. I wonder why. By this time you should know where I get this notion from about this song. I could happily discuss it in greater detail in a more conducive asking. and you claim that they are unprovable and thus, > should not be considered? > > All right, well, start citing sources for this one, > please. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Dance In My Pants - GTKarber 05:49 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| Next: | re: Dance In My Pants - daveake 11:46 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| Thread: |
|