not logged in
| re: Dance In My Pants | |
Posted by:  |
Smeghead 11:28 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Dance In My Pants - pidunk 11:09 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
JD Ban her please. > > > > Susan, this is great. You know how when we mention things > > which are easily verifiable, for example, who sang on what > > song, > > Such as Rory Dodd where Jim actually sings? Sources which > are "easily verifiable" are as questionable as anyone's > claim of authenticity including my own. I have no claim on > virtual god-like authority as reality. However, I am > honest and truthful. I won't say to you what I have not > come to believe fully and well myself based upon my own > standards. My own standards are developed from the years > of my upbringing in which I was taught to be discerning > above all, of all sources, and measure the efficacy of > truth from sources that are deemed accurate by their > physical/aural/logical constructs of perceptions in > corroboration with them, such as sight, sound, and > sequential reasonability of facts available to know. By > verifiable sources, sir, I do not exist. Therefore, > I do hope that you should understand I have sensitivity > where facts and fictioned verifications are concerned in > this society which we as a people together have inherited. > > > That said, as I have gone along I have in fact been giving > sources here, and asked for sources and been denied that > courtesy. To whatever extent there is of your own > contribution, from you sir, I have a large amount of > ATTITUDE and not much else. You, who look like a certain > font in text on a grey board to me, are assumed to be made > of flesh blood and bone. I extend that courtesy of > assumption towards you as I am entitled to likewise. Thus, > you could politely acknowledge that I do cite sources, and > with this at this juncture, I have all the belief in my > heart that you want to shoot down whatever I say....so you > are asking me, Tell us what angle to strike you at. If you > are really interested sir in what I have to say, I believe > you would see the lack of substance brought about by > others to the board and to me, and tell me, gee, this is > different, are you sure? But you don't. You, pixels grey, > do not give this. I wonder why. > > By this time you should know where I get this notion from > about this song. I could happily discuss it in greater > detail in a more conducive asking. > > > > > > > > and you claim that they are unprovable and thus, > > should not be considered? > > > > All right, well, start citing sources for this one, > > please. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | SUSAN - rockfenris2005 11:30 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| Next: | re: Dance In My Pants - Pudding 11:23 pm UTC 05/15/07 |
| Thread: | |