| re: 2 points | |
|
Posted by: |
Wilbury 12:03 pm UTC 05/16/07 |
| In reply to: | re: 2 points - rockfenris2005 11:48 am UTC 05/16/07 |
| How odd, to say the least. (The jpeg issue is separate, by the sounds of it. Whatever software your using, I presume Paint, is putting too much compression on the image. The jpeg "quality" is probably somewhere at about 5 -- out of 12. See if you can change it in options or something). > > > > Yeah... not making a whole lot of sense there. > > > > I presume you mean when you save pictures from the net, in > > which case they'll simply be in the same format as they > > are when sitting on the server. In which case consider > > yourself lucky they are PNGs and not heavily compressed > > jpegs. > > > > (saving them as jpegs wrecks the quality because that's > > what jpeg compression is designed to do (systematically) > > in order to reduce file size. Why do you want to resave a > > .png as a .jpg anyway? To put it back up on the net?) > > > > > > It's hard to explain. > > Example: right-click on the "Rockman" header. It should > say it's a JPG. The problem is, when I save it, it's not > saved as a JPG. It saves as a PNG. Problem is, PNG's are > really huge. When I change it back to a JPG some of the > quality is lost. > > Whereas, if I were to take a PRINTSHOT of the Rockman > page, I could save that image as a JPG easily (it's just > something you can do.) Then I could crop it > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: 2 points - rockfenris2005 11:48 am UTC 05/16/07 |
| Next: | re: 2 points - rockfenris2005 12:11 pm UTC 05/16/07 |
| Thread: |
|