| re: Okay, now here�s the proof that wordnix was right | |
|
Posted by: |
daveake 07:56 pm UTC 01/04/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Okay, now here�s the proof that wordnix was right - wordnix 07:47 pm UTC 01/04/09 |
| My last comment: Having 5 incoming emails when I didn't ask for 1 is spam. Having more sent to me, after I replied, without him addressing the points in my email, is spam. His script may well be top notch, but his English in the script will need to be a whole lot better than in those emails. "enlarge" instead of "and large", for example. Oh, and he described that "erotic" project as being "dirty", so so much for your interpretation. Bye now. Dave > It's not spam, it's that someone with 30 years in the > industry is more used to rapid fire conversation and not > big long emails. He's on your spam list, > whoop-de-frickin'-do. You can't take the heat, stay out of > the kitchen, simple as that. > > > Only 2? He's been spamming me a lot more than that. > > > > He doesn't appear to have read my reply properly. > > > > He's now in my spam list. > > > > The End. > > > > Dave | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Okay, now here�s the proof that wordnix was right - wordnix 07:47 pm UTC 01/04/09 |
| Next: | re: Okay, now here�s the proof that wordnix was right - rockfenris2005 12:28 am UTC 01/05/09 |
| Thread: |
|