HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Okay, now here�s the proof that wordnix was right

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 12:28 am UTC 01/05/09
In reply to: re: Okay, now here�s the proof that wordnix was right - daveake 07:56 pm UTC 01/04/09


WILL YOU FUCK OFF!!!!

> My last comment:
>
> Having 5 incoming emails when I didn't ask for 1 is spam.
>
> Having more sent to me, after I replied, without him
> addressing the points in my email, is spam.
>
> His script may well be top notch, but his English in the
> script will need to be a whole lot better than in those
> emails. "enlarge" instead of "and large", for example.
>
> Oh, and he described that "erotic" project as being
> "dirty", so so much for your interpretation.
>
> Bye now.
>
> Dave
>
> > It's not spam, it's that someone with 30 years in the
> > industry is more used to rapid fire conversation and not
> > big long emails. He's on your spam list,
> > whoop-de-frickin'-do. You can't take the heat, stay out of
> > the kitchen, simple as that.
> >
> > > Only 2? He's been spamming me a lot more than that.
> > >
> > > He doesn't appear to have read my reply properly.
> > >
> > > He's now in my spam list.
> > >
> > > The End.
> > >
> > > Dave


reply |

Previous: re: Okay, now here�s the proof that wordnix was right - daveake 07:56 pm UTC 01/04/09
Next: Formal statement - wordnix 03:42 pm UTC 01/04/09

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE