| re: Okay, now here�s the proof that wordnix was right | |
|
Posted by: |
rockfenris2005 12:28 am UTC 01/05/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Okay, now here�s the proof that wordnix was right - daveake 07:56 pm UTC 01/04/09 |
WILL YOU FUCK OFF!!!! > My last comment: > > Having 5 incoming emails when I didn't ask for 1 is spam. > > Having more sent to me, after I replied, without him > addressing the points in my email, is spam. > > His script may well be top notch, but his English in the > script will need to be a whole lot better than in those > emails. "enlarge" instead of "and large", for example. > > Oh, and he described that "erotic" project as being > "dirty", so so much for your interpretation. > > Bye now. > > Dave > > > It's not spam, it's that someone with 30 years in the > > industry is more used to rapid fire conversation and not > > big long emails. He's on your spam list, > > whoop-de-frickin'-do. You can't take the heat, stay out of > > the kitchen, simple as that. > > > > > Only 2? He's been spamming me a lot more than that. > > > > > > He doesn't appear to have read my reply properly. > > > > > > He's now in my spam list. > > > > > > The End. > > > > > > Dave | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Okay, now here�s the proof that wordnix was right - daveake 07:56 pm UTC 01/04/09 |
| Next: | Formal statement - wordnix 03:42 pm UTC 01/04/09 |
| Thread: | |