HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Formal statement

Posted by:
lotus_nz 10:26 pm UTC 01/07/09
In reply to: Formal statement - wordnix 03:42 pm UTC 01/04/09

are you still going on and on about this bull shit, when does your shift start at MC'D you child....



> Mr. Haase has never been involved in the production of any
> XXX venture as a director or producer. Please show a
> single piece of pornography where Mr. Haase is credited by
> name or functioned as a director or producer. That's
> right, you can't. As a writer, particularly after a career
> which has been marked by literary work of the highest
> quality, Mr. Haase resents these attempts to slander him
> by purposely mis-characterizing an impeccable career by a
> single advertisement that was never answered.
>
> As a writer, Mr. Haase believes strongly in the first
> amendment--free speech, free thought--and will write
> whatever he pleases. Further, the proof of the slander is
> Mr. Akerman's posting an obscure ad which was never
> answered when examples of Mr. Haase's work abound on the
> Internet, including his best-selling cookbook, his
> AUDELCO-nominated production of Frederick Douglass,
> and his acclaimed production of Stephen Schwartz's
> Godspell in Harlem.
>
> The discussion of filmed erotica or pornography is moot in
> any case, as there is no more market for it when the
> Internet supplies erotic material in huge quantities for
> low monies. There is no more filmed erotic industry, and
> that hardly matters anyway since Mr. Haase has never been
> an active participant in the production of pornography or,
> for that matter, erotica. Mr. Haase admits that at a
> financially desperate moment he entertained the thought
> (the intention was always to do erotica, not porno, the
> distinct difference between which was shown in the earlier
> thread), but that is the only thing he is guilty of.
>
> The notion of an erotic production was perhaps one genre
> in a catalogue of twenty such areas. It has never been
> actualized, and further is not being actively solicited,
> nor will it be, as there is no market for this, and Mr.
> Haase has had an entirely respectable career in literary
> adaptation.
>
> Periodically, we investigate all side thoughts, ideas,
> etc., but Mr. Haase has never been actively involved in
> the direction or production of pornography and will sue
> anyone who calls him or implies him to be a pornographer,
> including you. He has led a spotless life and will sue
> anyone who says otherwise. I'd suggest you watch your
> mouth.


reply |

Previous: Formal statement - wordnix 03:42 pm UTC 01/04/09
Next: re: Formal statement - Steve10086 06:20 pm UTC 01/04/09

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE