| re: Jims' BOOH musical is still a GO |
|
Posted by:
 |
Pudding 07:37 pm UTC 01/31/09 |
| In reply to: |
re: Jims' BOOH musical is still a GO - Smeghead 11:44 am UTC 01/31/09 |
|
That's true, but to specifically mention that they're maintaining their investment on a document that they didn't need to, would add sway to the argument that the musical still is a go.
> There are plenty of instances of companies holding rights
> and never exercising them... there are also occasional
> instances of companies holding rights just so other
> companies can't make a film. There's the infamous
> Fantastic Four film that was made for 2 million dollars
> and never released just so that the producers could keep
> their rights to the characters and not let them go to
> someone else and they then waited another decade to film
> and release the real version.
>
> > Creative Entertainment Group have released a financial
> > report on the state of the company and apart from a lot of
> > it being a load of boring twaddle, there's a bit that
> > isn't.
> >
> > "However we are maintaining our investments in our
> > Theatrical Division's performing rights for Jim
> > Steinman's Bat out of Hell"
> >
> > Seems to me that they wouldn't be maintaining their
> > investment if it wasn't going to happen.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Jims' BOOH musical is still a GO - Smeghead 11:44 am UTC 01/31/09 |
| Next: |
re: Jims' BOOH musical is still a GO - daveake 12:57 pm UTC 01/31/09 |
|
| Thread: |
|