| re: Musical Love Songs | |
|
Posted by: |
Scaramouche 09:31 am UTC 02/18/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Musical Love Songs - Smeghead 11:47 pm UTC 02/17/09 |
| > There is more than one type of love song and FCOL is a > mature love song... it is not about teenage angst and > sex... which is what Peter and Wendy's love is. Agreed, but who knows what Jim has now written. Maybe > It hadn't changed hardly at all when Jim lifted huge > sections of it and stuck them into DOTV. So I doubt he > will have re-written much. He will have some writer he > has hired to re-write it... which I fear will water it > down and not make it the show it should be. I wouldn't say there were 'huge sections' in DOTV and in any case what Jim did there was a bit of a faux pas. If you read Jim's comments about the NYC 'reading' he says it's the greatest thing he's ever written, which suggests to me that it is (in the main) something completely new? > How? How does Batman saying God Speed, speed us away > make any lyrical sense in the context of the song? The way I see it is all the citizens of Gotham are locking down their shops & buildings and heading out into the night to make their way home. Batman is observing from high above and sees the fear in their faces, and realises he alone cannot protect them. He uses 'god speed' in it's literal sense 'safe journey' but also I think as a generalisation 'protect us god', 'save us o'lord', which ties in with the vespers piece before. > Peter does not love Wendy in the sense of an everlasting > love. It is a fleeting teenage lustful love. Are u sure? I thought it was much more than that? > Surf's Up should and probably won't be his love song to > her. This could be the teenage lust anthem in the first act and then FCOL in the second act, when they are much older (depending on how Jim writes it)? > Bat out of Hell should be his other love song to her. Nope. I see this as the opening number to 'set the scene'. /messageboard/d/1314.html > FCOL really doesn't fit in. Maybe it would work with > Wendy singing it to Peter without the Faded Levis line. > Maybe I'm wrong...but I don't see it fitting in... In the '77 version then you are probably right, but I think Jim has done a LOT of re-writing. > it seems to me that the only reason everyone wants it in > the show is because it is a great song... not because it > organically fits there. Well as previously stated it has to fit. If Jim hasn't written a great section for it to work then don't bother, but I'm hoping he has. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Musical Love Songs - Smeghead 11:47 pm UTC 02/17/09 |
| Next: | re: Musical Love Songs - Pudding 03:09 am UTC 02/18/09 |
| Thread: | |