| re: Mr. Smeg is trying really hard (the poor dear) |
|
Posted by:
 |
rockfenris2005 10:19 am UTC 08/04/09 |
| In reply to: |
re: Mr. Smeg is trying really hard (the poor dear) - Pudding 10:13 am UTC 08/04/09 |
|
> You made no valid example whatsoever, just random
> nonsense. My blog was for up to date news and the sharing
> of goods, its never been a discussion board.
>
> You claim you're sane when clearly you're not. You daft
> cunt.
Use your brains. It's a valid example. Syd Barrett was still alive doing nothing with his career and plenty of people were talking about him instead of trashing other people on his forums. The comparison is there. I don't care what you say. To you I say:
I'm sorry. You are wasting our time. Please stop this and discuss Jim Steinman's work.
Fact: I am sane. I don't care what you say. To you I say:
I'm sorry. You are wasting our time. Please stop this and discuss Jim Steinman's work.
You resort to petty name-calling after people disagree with you for any extended period of time. Your behaviour in these instances is more twisted than the """lunatics""" who post here. You twist little things around into a complete and utter character assassination and if that person is not smart, there can be no vindication. To me, those types of people are the """lunatics""", not the ones they accuse. I'd feel more safe talking to these """lunatics" on a dark night in an alley than talking to people like you.
Now go start a Steinman thread. Or perhaps you should play with your toys?
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Mr. Smeg is trying really hard (the poor dear) - Pudding 10:13 am UTC 08/04/09 |
| Next: |
PS. - rockfenris2005 10:33 am UTC 08/04/09 |
|
| Thread: |
|